On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 1 Nov 2008, Ed Murphy wrote: >> Proposal 5817 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=1) by Murphy >> Private pledges are pointless >> >> Amend Rule 2191 (Pledges) by replacing "A pledge is a contract" >> with "A pledge is a public contract". >> > > I call for judgement on the following statement: > All non-public pledges that existed at the time of passage > of Proposal 5817 are null and void (i.e. no longer exist).
UNDETERMINED. There may still be non-public contracts that were pledges with more than one party. -root
