On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> What Ørjan means ("Testing...") is that e slipped it into a field of
> that last email...
Yeah, I know. But I checked the aforementioned archive to verify that
nobody did the same in a message actually containing a vote.
On Sun, 19 Jul 2015, omd wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> > Do you really need special list admin powers for that? Testing...
>
> You don't, but a quick archive grep suggests that nobody tried this in
> a voting message. I also doubt it would work legally, any
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> Do you really need special list admin powers for that? Testing...
You don't, but a quick archive grep suggests that nobody tried this in
a voting message. I also doubt it would work legally, any more than
you can publish something by putti
On Sun, 19 Jul 2015, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Also add Joe Piercy and aranea to "without" column. And confirming no
overly-clever Distributor slipped it into the raw headers ;). -G.
Do you really need special list admin powers for that? Testing...
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Sun, 19 Jul 2015, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jul 2015, omd wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > > I'll opine on the effect in Rulekeepor's Notes this week, at least (I
> > > haven't reviewed votes so no idea if it's controversial or not at
> > > the moment).
On Sun, 19 Jul 2015, omd wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > I'll opine on the effect in Rulekeepor's Notes this week, at least (I
> > haven't reviewed votes so no idea if it's controversial or not at
> > the moment). -G.
>
> A quick check shows:
>
> voted FOR wit
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I'll opine on the effect in Rulekeepor's Notes this week, at least (I
> haven't reviewed votes so no idea if it's controversial or not at
> the moment). -G.
A quick check shows:
voted FOR with pseudo-acronym (2): ais523 Warrigal
voted FOR wi
7 matches
Mail list logo
