On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > I'll opine on the effect in Rulekeepor's Notes this week, at least (I > haven't reviewed votes so no idea if it's controversial or not at > the moment). -G.
A quick check shows: voted FOR with pseudo-acronym (2): ais523 Warrigal voted FOR without pseudo-acronym (4): omd Tiger Tekneek Roujo G. attempted to be ambiguous about it, but either way, pseudo-acronym wouldn't hit 50%.
