On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:53 PM, ais523 wrote:
> PerlNomic's sufficiently automated that it's likely to keep on sending
> them, oblivious to the circumstances, until someone tells it to shut up.
The notifications to Agora have to be sent by a logged-in user. Votes
on Agoran proposals, on the oth
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 13:50 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 09:25, comex wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:20 AM, The PerlNomic Partnership
> > wrote:
> >> This message serves to announce and make effective changes to
> >> the list of parties to the PerlNomic Partnership (
On 10 Dec 2008, at 19:02, Ed Murphy wrote:
IMO, becoming an active player of PerlNomic constitutes sufficiently
"explicit, willful consent" to satisfy R101(iii), whereas merely
making
an announcement does not. Similarly for the others. (I would cite
CFJ
1290, but the standard at that time
Warrigal wrote:
> "This is a public contract and a pledge known as Wooble's Mousetrap.
> Parties to this contract are known as Mice. Every player who makes an
> announcement (other than an announcement of eir deregistration) is a
> Mouse; no other persons are Mice. Mice SHALL do anything Warrigal
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10 Dec 2008, at 14:00, Warrigal wrote:
>> A player plays Bolero by making an announcement (other than an
>> announcement of eir deregistration)."
>
> This is where it fails.
>
> Well, it also fails in that contracts are e
On 10 Dec 2008, at 14:18, Warrigal wrote:
"playing Bolero therefore indicates that one agrees to this contract."
No dice.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10 Dec 2008, at 14:00, Warrigal wrote:
>> A player plays Bolero by making an announcement (other than an
>> announcement of eir deregistration)."
>
> This is where it fails.
>
> Well, it also fails in that contracts are e
On 10 Dec 2008, at 14:00, Warrigal wrote:
A player plays Bolero by making an announcement (other than an
announcement of eir deregistration)."
This is where it fails.
Well, it also fails in that contracts are explicitly restricted
in Agora. But if it was a real game, that'd be where it fails.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If you're not a member of the Partnership, the PNP CANNOT act by your
>> actions using the mechanisms of the game and thus did not publish that
>> message.
>
> How do you conclude that?
You quoted it yourself:
"The PerlNomic P
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:26 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> the PNP? (It was: "The PerlNomic Partnership shall act by using the
>> mechanisms of the PerlNomic game to send messages to the appropriate
>> Agoran
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the PNP? (It was: "The PerlNomic Partnership shall act by using the
> mechanisms of the PerlNomic game to send messages to the appropriate
> Agoran fora. This is the only mechanism by which the PerlNomic
> Partnership may act."
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Claim of error: I am not a party to the PerlNomic Partnership.
>
> I don't see Warrigal on that list. :D
I do.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 7:15 PM, The PerlNomic
12 matches
Mail list logo
