On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If you're not a member of the Partnership, the PNP CANNOT act by your >> actions using the mechanisms of the game and thus did not publish that >> message. > > How do you conclude that?
You quoted it yourself: "The PerlNomic Partnership shall act by using the mechanisms of the PerlNomic game to send messages to the appropriate Agoran fora. This is the only mechanism by which the PerlNomic Partnership may act.") If the PerlNomic Partnership did not use the mechanisms of the game to cause the partnership to publish a message, then the contract stipulates that the partnership may not act, and no other mechanism for its action is provided. If you're not a party to the contract, PNP is INNOCENT as it didn't publish the alleged message (you, as the Executor of the message, caused a helpless computer system to forge a message claiming to be from the PNP in a dastardly attempt to frame the partnership for a crime it did not commit). If you are a member, the case should be judged UNIMPUGNED as the action of publishing the message did not violate the rule in question.
