On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, omd wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Not a god, no. An Instrument of the gods.
> >
> >> but, as above, I think the implication is "actions that the President CAN
> >> take".
> >
> > ...as an Instrument.
>
> Well, you said that "CAN take actio
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Not a god, no. An Instrument of the gods.
>
>> but, as above, I think the implication is "actions that the President CAN
>> take".
>
> ...as an Instrument.
Well, you said that "CAN take actions" counts as R105 permission to
take the action of
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, omd wrote:
> the President was supposed to be a virtual player, not a god.
Not a god, no. An Instrument of the gods.
> but, as above, I think the implication is "actions that the President CAN
> take".
...as an Instrument.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> R106 says that Proposals can and do
> make changes in general and provide a mechanism (just as the president can
> take actions in general by way of a different mechanism)
Gratuitous: CFJ 2213 is highly relevant. I misremembered the
preceden
comex wrote:
> Of course, that creates a good interest-of-the-game reason to judge
> that R101 i. is just broken for some reason or other, because who
> knows what spurious actions have been announced in the last two
> months.
Well, if anyone can do what e wilt, ehird's Announcement of Chaos
actual
On 5/22/08, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The fact that the Rules that would prevent it are "an explicit, binding
> agreement to the contrary". Unless someone once again broke the part
> that says that the Rules are treated as a binding agreement between
> all players... is that gone
On Thu, 22 May 2008, comex wrote:
> No, what I willed is that Agora's R101 be amended in the manner I
> specified. I had the privilege to amend it and I did. What part of
> the preamble contradicts this?
The fact that the Rules that would prevent it are "an explicit, binding
agreement to the co
On 5/22/08, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A. That's why (i) is a privilege and not a right. Read the R101 preamble.
The rules may define persons as possessing specific rights or
privileges. Be it hereby proclaimed that no binding agreement
or interpretation of Agor
8 matches
Mail list logo
