On Thu, 22 May 2008, comex wrote: > No, what I willed is that Agora's R101 be amended in the manner I > specified. I had the privilege to amend it and I did. What part of > the preamble contradicts this?
The fact that the Rules that would prevent it are "an explicit, binding agreement to the contrary". Unless someone once again broke the part that says that the Rules are treated as a binding agreement between all players... is that gone somewhere again? -Goethe ps. The main question is the one above about privileges. But for rights, the Rules don't have to declare that rights exist. Rights exist outside the rules (e.g. natural rights) and "be it hereby proclaimed" states, in the strongest of strong possible terms, that the Rules recognize them.
