On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Charles Walker <
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I transfer a prop from myself to BobTHJ because I really like his
> Proposal Review Board idea, and I've stolen parts of it for this
> proto:
>
What do people think about a proto pool in general? Something
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 10:47 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> Add a penalty for authoring proposals that are rejected to the current
>> distributability system and the problem goes away without an extra
>> layer of bureaucracy.
>
> What about a sor
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 10:47 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Charles
> Walker wrote:
> > My hope is that this solves the problems of large, cluttered
> > distributions and badly written proposals.
>
> Add a penalty for authoring proposals that are rejected to the cur
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Charles
Walker wrote:
> My hope is that this solves the problems of large, cluttered
> distributions and badly written proposals.
Add a penalty for authoring proposals that are rejected to the current
distributability system and the problem goes away without an ext
I transfer a prop from myself to BobTHJ because I really like his
Proposal Review Board idea, and I've stolen parts of it for this
proto:
{
Create a proto pool. Only disinterested proposals can be submitted
directly to the proposal pool; all others must first be submitted to
the proto pool. Proto
5 matches
Mail list logo
