On Mon, 26 Feb 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > I also massively disagree with CFJ 3580, for the " Agora exists
> > platonically, and so can exist without the rest of reality" thing, for the
> > same reasons that CFJ 3622 gave that judgement.
Hi CuddleBeam,
I wanted to come back to this a little a
On Mon, 26 Feb 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> Is there some way to challenge past CFJs? Besides the moot thing, which is
> too late now to do for that.
You can always re-call the same statement or similar. The Judge could say
"CFJ 3580 was decided wrongly, and this is the new decision." However,
Consider that the CFJ ruling is made on the basis of the rules. In some
sense, it's the game thinking about itself. There's a pretty strong
historical basis for Agorans believing in a platonic reality, so the ruling
codifies that. However, it doesn't necessarily mean that it's actually
true, just t
(Solely existing in our minds as a "game", the mailing lists and such exist
out of our heads of course, but the bits and pixels and whatnot mean
nothing until we come around and give it that meaning of being "Agora", but
that's further off the main point I want to make that Agora does not exist
pla
Interesting how "CFJ 1911-1914 (called Mar 18, 2008): Physical realities
supersede the Rules by default." and "CFJ: 3580 Called: 21 Oct 2017: The
rules can override reality for game purposes." are around at the same time.
(It works, though)
I also massively disagree with CFJ 3580, for the " Agora
H. Rulekeepor, some suggested annotations follow. I've chosen things
that might be of historical interest pretty much randomly.
-Aris
---
Rule: 869
CFJ: 3625
Called: 12 Feb 2018
Consent to abide by some of the rules does not suffice for registration.
Rule: 2141
CFJ: 3622
Called: 7 Feb 2018
A stat
6 matches
Mail list logo
