On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
>> This fails as it is inadequate to clearly identify either Rule 2148
>> (The Ambassador) or Rule 2185 (Foreign Relations).
>
> Well, dang. If anyone cares (you should care since you voted for it) I
> meant the Ambassador one, so it's the nu
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:34 PM, comex wrote:
>> Proposal 6137 (Ordinary, AI=1.0, Interest=0) by Tiger
>> Ambassador Anarchy
>> Repeal Rule 2148 (Foreign Relations)
>
> This fails as it is inadequate to clearly identify either Rule 2148
> (The Ambassador) or Rule 2185 (Foreign Relations).
Well,
2 matches
Mail list logo
