On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn <jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> This fails as it is inadequate to clearly identify either Rule 2148 >> (The Ambassador) or Rule 2185 (Foreign Relations). > > Well, dang. If anyone cares (you should care since you voted for it) I > meant the Ambassador one, so it's the number that's correct. I blame > the fact that all those rules have [Foreign relations] tacked onto > them. But I guess it failed anyway.
No problem, proposals fail for trivial reasons like that all the time. Actually, I would have liked to see an Anarchist proposal actually pass.
