comex wrote:
On Monday 13 August 2007, Ed Murphy wrote:
No, it isn't. S/(S+O) = 0/(0+0) = 0/0 = 0 (Rule 2146), which
is <= 1/2 (Rule 2124), so the OSbA is REJECTED (Rule 955).
You're right. Therefore, my notice resolving the decision was invalid, so
the decision is still active. Would you
On Monday 13 August 2007, Ed Murphy wrote:
> No, it isn't. S/(S+O) = 0/(0+0) = 0/0 = 0 (Rule 2146), which
> is <= 1/2 (Rule 2124), so the OSbA is REJECTED (Rule 955).
You're right. Therefore, my notice resolving the decision was invalid, so
the decision is still active. Would you like to vote
comex wrote:
For the agoran decision I initiated in this message:
http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2007-August/007098.html
(published 7 days ago)
the options available are APPROVED and REJECTED.
No votes were made.
The option therefore selected by Agora is APP
3 matches
Mail list logo
