comex wrote:
On Monday 13 August 2007, Ed Murphy wrote:No, it isn't. S/(S+O) = 0/(0+0) = 0/0 = 0 (Rule 2146), which is <= 1/2 (Rule 2124), so the OSbA is REJECTED (Rule 955).You're right. Therefore, my notice resolving the decision was invalid, so the decision is still active. Would you like to vote SUPPORT or OBJECT?
Maybe.
