Fair points. It just doesn't quite feel right to me. I might change my
vote, maybe not.
On 10/28/2018 10:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Sun, 28 Oct 2018, ATMunn wrote:
8122 Murphy 3.0 Middle of the road
AGAINST, this doesn't have any actual effect at the moment and it just
com
On Sun, 28 Oct 2018, ATMunn wrote:
> > 8122 Murphy 3.0 Middle of the road
> AGAINST, this doesn't have any actual effect at the moment and it just
> complicates the math for the Assessor.
It has a couple current effects:
>From R2556:
> The voting strength of a player on an
Thinking it through, I don't think there's a practical effect worth a
CFJ - remembering that you can't "create" new proposals by distribution,
I'd say the first one was a correct distribution, the second one failed
to distribute (because those proposals weren't in the pool), but both
will self-r
It was intended to imply that I hadn’t sent it to the official forum, and
was now doing so. An abbreviation for “hey, I realized I sent this to BUS,
and now I want it on OFF for the official record”. I’ll admit that it’s
slightly ambiguous though. You can CFJ if you want whether I attempted to
dist
On Sun, 28 Oct 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> TTttOF.
Hrm, the sending to BUS was clearly effective, so what does re-sending
it to the OF with the sort of abbreviation that implies you're doing
it in the second message do?
5 matches
Mail list logo
