Tiger wrote:
> 2009/3/26 Ed Murphy :
>> Rodlen wrote:
>>
>>> Oh right, and I had better hail Eris.
>>>
>>> Hail Eris.
>>>
>>> There.
>> I yell CREAMPUFF.
>>
> I support.
>
> (Is this Mornington Nomic all of a sudden?)
Fish!
CREAMPUFF comes from B Nomic:
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/archives/spoon-d
2009/3/26 Ed Murphy :
> Rodlen wrote:
>
>> Oh right, and I had better hail Eris.
>>
>> Hail Eris.
>>
>> There.
>
> I yell CREAMPUFF.
>
I support.
(Is this Mornington Nomic all of a sudden?)
--
-Tiger
Rodlen wrote:
> Oh right, and I had better hail Eris.
>
> Hail Eris.
>
> There.
I yell CREAMPUFF.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:56 AM, The PerlNomic Partnership <
perlno...@nomictools.com> wrote:
> This distribution of proposal 6167 initiates the Agoran
> Decisions on whether to adopt it. The eligible voters for ordinary
> proposals are the active players, the eligible voters for democratic
> pro
2009/3/26 The PerlNomic Partnership :
> NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
> 6167 D 1 3.0 comex Foo
I vote AGAINST this proposal.
--
-Tiger
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2009/3/26 Kerim Aydin :
>> I guess my options are ignore one out of three, response to all and
>> get annoyed/frustrated/exhausted, or just deregister for a time and
>> take a breath. Not sure which is best right now.
>>
>> -Goethe
>
> 's just a game.
>
2009/3/26 Kerim Aydin :
> I guess my options are ignore one out of three, response to all and
> get annoyed/frustrated/exhausted, or just deregister for a time and
> take a breath. Not sure which is best right now.
>
> -Goethe
's just a game.
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, comex wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:
>>> Proposal 6167 (Democratic, AI=3.0, Interest=1) by comex
>>> Foo
>>>
>>> Create a Power=3 Rule which reads: { comex CAN cause this rule to amend
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:
>> Proposal 6167 (Democratic, AI=3.0, Interest=1) by comex
>> Foo
>>
>> Create a Power=3 Rule which reads: { comex CAN cause this rule to amend
>> itself
>> by announcement. }
>
> While
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:
> Proposal 6167 (Democratic, AI=3.0, Interest=1) by comex
> Foo
>
> Create a Power=3 Rule which reads: { comex CAN cause this rule to amend itself
> by announcement. }
While I respect anyone has the right to do these things, I'm really bored o
Elliott Hird wrote:
> Comex triggered the activation himself, obviously. This is clearly not
> standard operating procedure.
That doesn't change the fact that the PNP is being sloppy.
2009/3/26 Sean Hunt :
> This is outright incorrect. No CoE is formally required due to the fact
> that it isn't self-ratifying, but this most certainly does not count as
> as fulfillment of the PNP's duties to report the Proposal Pool.
>
> This sort of thing is why I'm running for Promotor.
>
Come
The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:
> Proposal pool: empty
This is outright incorrect. No CoE is formally required due to the fact
that it isn't self-ratifying, but this most certainly does not count as
as fulfillment of the PNP's duties to report the Proposal Pool.
This sort of thing is why I'm runn
13 matches
Mail list logo
