Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 7858-7863

2017-06-17 Thread V.J Rada
there was not, it is done. On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Where was there an objection to the second intent? > > -Aris > > On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 6:22 PM Quazie wrote: > >> You do not - there was an objection >> >> On Sat, Jun 17, 2

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 7858-7863

2017-06-17 Thread Aris Merchant
Where was there an objection to the second intent? -Aris On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 6:22 PM Quazie wrote: > You do not - there was an objection > > On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 17:58 Aris Merchant < > thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:51 AM Aris Merchant < >>

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 7858-7863

2017-06-17 Thread Quazie
You do not - there was an objection On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 17:58 Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:51 AM Aris Merchant < > thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Alex Smith >> wrote: >> > On Mon, 2

DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 7858-7863

2017-06-13 Thread Owen Jacobson
I vote as follows: > ID Author(s) AI Title Pender Pend fee (sh.) > - > 7958* Aris, [1] 3.0 Assets v7 Aris 6 FOR. Aris, your commitment to making this happen is c

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 7858-7863

2017-06-13 Thread Aris Merchant
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Question: does Aris's announcement of intent "identify a lack" as per > R107 and kill the decision just by being intended? I can see arguments > on both sides of that one, but definitely *don't* want to muck it up with > a CFJ before some di

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 7858-7863

2017-06-12 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 13 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2017-06-12 at 22:41 +, Aris Merchant wrote: > > Grr. My fault. Will anyone mind if I ratify this away? Only way I can think > > of fixing it, so I'm going to try. I intend, without objection, to ratify > > the following document: {{The proposal

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 7858-7863

2017-06-12 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
I concur with ais523. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Jun 12, 2017, at 7:16 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-06-12 at 22:41 +, Aris Merchant wrote: >> Grr. My fault. Will anyone mind if I ratify this away? Only way I can think >> of fixin

DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 7858-7863

2017-06-12 Thread Quazie
7958? This is good because 7858 is indeed a proposal already, but the out of order numbering is confusing. Sorry I didn't catch this earlier. On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 9:34 PM Quazie wrote: > >> ID Author(s) AI Title Pender Pend fee >> (sh.) >>