On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > Question: does Aris's announcement of intent "identify a lack" as per > R107 and kill the decision just by being intended? I can see arguments > on both sides of that one, but definitely *don't* want to muck it up with > a CFJ before some discussion. (Mind you, the way R107 is written, maybe > even discussion forum lack-identification counts - is there a precedent > on that?)
It most definitely does not identify a lack. There's nothing to stop the promotor from giving a proposal any unused ID number. In fact, a proposal can be distributed without an ID number, the promotor is just obliged to provide one in a timely fashion. -Aris
