comex wrote:
>Do you have a suggestion for what else the except-as-noted-below
>clause could mean?
It's obviously meant to match up with a later provision along the lines
of "A person who is wearing a hat does not gain the usual blue mark for
calling for judgement.". However, there is no such pro
On 12/20/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The argument against blue mark awards for excess CFJing rests on the
> interpretation that section (-b), by mentioning a circumstance that is
> a subset of the trigger for (+b), implicitly "notes" that (+b)'s award
> does not occur in that more speci
2 matches
Mail list logo
