On 12/20/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The argument against blue mark awards for excess CFJing rests on the > interpretation that section (-b), by mentioning a circumstance that is > a subset of the trigger for (+b), implicitly "notes" that (+b)'s award > does not occur in that more specific situation. I contend that that > is an unjustified interpretation, reading way more into (-b) than is > written there.
Do you have a suggestion for what else the except-as-noted-below clause could mean? Otherwise, as that bit is rather unclear, the best interests of the game are that the rule work as intended. H. Murphy, what was the intent of that clause?
