On Tuesday 04 December 2007 21:21:15 Ed Murphy wrote:
> pikhq wrote:
>
> > I don't. Wait for the proposal adding UNAWARE to pass *succesfully*. ;)
>
> And risk being dinged for late judgement? I think not.
>
>
It should be done a few hours before you need to judge it. . . Of course, you
migh
pikhq wrote:
I don't. Wait for the proposal adding UNAWARE to pass *succesfully*. ;)
And risk being dinged for late judgement? I think not.
On Tuesday 04 December 2007 20:43:33 Taral wrote:
> On 12/4/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I do not consent to this. With consent of the other members, I intend
> > to have the panel judge OVERTURN to EXCUSED, with these arguments (as
> > I wrote earlier today):
> >
> > By the preced
On 12/4/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do not consent to this. With consent of the other members, I intend
> to have the panel judge OVERTURN to EXCUSED, with these arguments (as
> I wrote earlier today):
>
> By the precedent of CFJ 1804, EXCUSED was appropriate, therefore GUILTY
> w
On Tuesday 04 December 2007 19:55:10 Taral wrote:
> On 12/4/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Prior question: 1812 culpability
> > Prior judgement:GUILTY
> > Prior assignment date: 04 Dec 2007 20:01:00 GMT
>
> With consent of
On 12/4/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Prior question: 1812 culpability
> Prior judgement:GUILTY
> Prior assignment date: 04 Dec 2007 20:01:00 GMT
With consent of the other members, I intend to have the panel judge
AFFIRM. T
6 matches
Mail list logo
