On Tuesday 04 December 2007 20:43:33 Taral wrote: > On 12/4/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I do not consent to this. With consent of the other members, I intend > > to have the panel judge OVERTURN to EXCUSED, with these arguments (as > > I wrote earlier today): > > > > By the precedent of CFJ 1804, EXCUSED was appropriate, therefore GUILTY > > was inappropriate. (UNAWARE would be more directly appropriate, except > > that Proposal 5319 was ineffective due to insufficient Power.) > > Ah, I misunderstood. I support this. > > -- > Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you." > -- Unknown >
I don't. Wait for the proposal adding UNAWARE to pass *succesfully*. ;)
