On Nov 26, 2007 4:54 PM, levi.stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 21, 2007, at 10:20 PM, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> >
> >> I am inclined to concur with Goethe's arguments as Appellant. Trial
> >> Judge Goddess Eris's arguments do nothing to address the case
Benjamin Schultz wrote:
On Nov 21, 2007, at 10:20 PM, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
I am inclined to concur with Goethe's arguments as Appellant. Trial
Judge Goddess Eris's arguments do nothing to address the case, so on
first brush I want to reassign the case. I'm interested in what my
fellow J
I am inclined to concur with Goethe's arguments as Appellant. Trial
Judge Goddess Eris's arguments do nothing to address the case, so on
first brush I want to reassign the case. I'm interested in what my
fellow Judges on the appeal panel have to say.
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
3 matches
Mail list logo