On Nov 26, 2007 4:54 PM, levi.stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Benjamin Schultz wrote: > > > > On Nov 21, 2007, at 10:20 PM, Benjamin Schultz wrote: > > > >> I am inclined to concur with Goethe's arguments as Appellant. Trial > >> Judge Goddess Eris's arguments do nothing to address the case, so on > >> first brush I want to reassign the case. I'm interested in what my > >> fellow Judges on the appeal panel have to say. > > > > I have not seen any discussion from the rest of the appeal panel. > > Accordingly, I submit my position officially: > > > > With the agreement of my fellow appeal panelists in CFJ 1786a -- > > BobTHJ and Levi -- I intend to have the appeal panel rule REASSIGN, as > > Goddess Eris's arguments in making her ruling did not address the case > > at hand. > Sorry, this one had slipped past me :) > > I agree to this judgement. > > Levi > > I also consent to this judgment.
BobTHJ
