On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-10-15 at 20:20 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> > pool.
>
> not-technically-a-CoE: The ID numbers listed i
On Sun, 2017-10-15 at 20:20 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> pool.
not-technically-a-CoE: The ID numbers listed in the summary at the
start and in the proposal descri
also, nttpf
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:41 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> "The problem here is that deregistration without objection isn’t
> cuddlebeam-proof."
>
> I think you mean everyone-proof! Omd and Murphy can't be deregistered
> rn and that's 1/10 of the whole Supply level right there.
>
> On Mon, Oct
"The problem here is that deregistration without objection isn’t
cuddlebeam-proof."
I think you mean everyone-proof! Omd and Murphy can't be deregistered
rn and that's 1/10 of the whole Supply level right there.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
>
>> On Oct 15, 2017, at 8:2
> On Oct 15, 2017, at 8:20 PM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
> quorum is 8.0 and the valid option
5 matches
Mail list logo
