also, nttpf
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:41 PM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "The problem here is that deregistration without objection isn’t
> cuddlebeam-proof."
>
> I think you mean everyone-proof! Omd and Murphy can't be deregistered
> rn and that's 1/10 of the whole Supply level right there.
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 15, 2017, at 8:20 PM, Aris Merchant
>>> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
>>> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
>>> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
>>> quorum is 8.0 and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is
>>> also a valid vote).
>>>
>>>
>>> ID Author(s) AI Title Pender Pend fee
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 7922* Alexis 3.0 Clarity Act Alexis 1 AP
>> FOR
>>> 7923* Gaelan 1.0 Another Economy Fix Attempt Gaelan 1 AP
>> AGAINST; this needs some fixes
>>> 7924* Aris, [1] 3.0 Contracts v8 Aris 1 sh.
>> FOR
>>> 7925* Aris, Alexis 3.0 Safety Regulations v2 Aris 1 AP
>> FOR
>>> 7926* Alexis 3.0 Deregulation Alexis 1 AP
>> CONDITIONAL: if safety regulations passed (or is about to pass), then
>> AGAINST. else, FOR. If, save for this sentence, a conditional vote on 7925
>> would cause the result of my vote on 7926 to be circular, act as if the
>> result of that conditional resolves to PRESENT.
>>> 7927* V.J. Rada, G. 2.0 Estate Auction Fix V.J. Rada 1 sh.
>> FOR
>>> 7928* G. 3.0 no we can't G. 1 AP
>> FOR
>>> 7929* V.J. Rada 1.0 Consumerism V.J. Rada 1 sh.
>>
>> AGAINST. The problem here is that deregistration without objection isn’t
>> cuddlebeam-proof. We should just fix that instead.
>>
>> Gaelan
>>
>>>
>>> The proposal pool currently contains the following proposals:
>>>
>>> ID Author(s) AI Title
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> pp1 o 2.0 Faster Auctions
>>>
>>> Legend: <ID>* : Proposal is pending.
>>>
>>> [1] o, G., ais523, Gaelan, 天火狐, CuddleBeam, V.J Rada, Trigon, Alexis, P.S.S.
>>>
>>> A proposal may be pended for 1 AP, or for 1/20th the Floating Value
>>> in shines (see the Secretary's report).
>>>
>>> The full text of the aforementioned proposals is included below. Please note
>>> that, due to its length, Proposal 7924 is listed last.
>>>
>>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>> ID: 7922
>>> Title: Clarity Act
>>> Adoption index: 3.0
>>> Author: Alexis
>>> Co-authors:
>>>
>>>
>>> Text in square brackets is not a part of this proposal's substance and
>>> is ignored when it takes effect.
>>>
>>> Enact a new power 3 rule entitled Voting Methods, reading as follows:
>>>
>>> Each Agoran decision has a voting method, which must be
>>> AI-majority, instant runoff, or first-past-the-post. The voting
>>> method is that specified by the authorizing authority, or
>>> first-past-the-post by default.
>>>
>>> Each Agoran decision has a set of valid options (the choices that
>>> the voters are being asked to select from) and valid votes (the
>>> ways in which the voters can express their opinion or lack thereof.
>>> For AI-majority decisions, the valid options are FOR and AGAINST;
>>> for other decisions, the valid options are defined by other rules.
>>>
>>> The valid votes on an Agoran decision are:
>>> 1. PRESENT;
>>> 2. The valid conditional votes, as defined by rules of power at
>>> least that of this rule; and
>>> 3. For an instant runoff decision, the ordered lists of entities.
>>> 4. For any other decision, the valid options.
>>>
>>> [This splits off the portion of 955 that isn't actually related to
>>> resolution. The definition of instant runoff is changed to evaluate
>>> validity of options at the end of the voting period, and avoid
>>> retroactively invalidating votes if an option drops out.]
>>>
>>> Amend Rule 955 by replacing the second paragraph and numbered list with
>>> the following and by deleting the second bullet in the unnumbered list.
>>>
>>> 1. For an AI-majority decision, let F be the total strength of all
>>> valid ballots cast FOR a decision, A be the same for AGAINST,
>>> and AI be the adoption index of the decision. The outcome is
>>> ADOPTED if F/A >= AI and F/A > 1 (or F>0 and A=0), otherwise
>>> REJECTED.
>>>
>>> 2. For an instant runoff decision, the outcome is whichever option
>>> wins according to the standard definition of instant runoff.
>>> For this purpose, a ballot of strength N is treated as if it
>>> were N distinct ballots expressing the same preferences. In
>>> case multiple valid options tie for the lowest number of votes
>>> at any stage, the vote collector CAN and must, in the
>>> announcement of the decision's resolution, select one such
>>> option to eliminate; if, for M > 1, all eir possible choices in
>>> the next M stages would result in the same set of options being
>>> eliminated, e need not specify the order of elimination. If an
>>> entity that is part of a valid vote is not a valid option at
>>> the end of the voting period, or disqualified by the rule
>>> providing for the decision, then that entity is eliminated
>>> prior to the first round of counting.
>>>
>>> 3. For a first-past-the-post decision, the outcome is whichever
>>> option received the highest total strength of valid ballots. In
>>> case of a tie, the vote collector CAN and must, in the
>>> announcement of the decision's resolution, select one of the
>>> leaders as the outcome.
>>>
>>> [No change here, except for removing the valid votes, and clearly
>>> specifying what happens to options that are no longer valid at the end
>>> of the voting period.]
>>>
>>> If the text "The rule providing for an Agoran Decision by instant runoff
>>> may disqualify one or more options; in such a case, they are eliminated
>>> prior to beginning the first stage of the vote count." appears in Rule
>>> 955, delete it.
>>>
>>> [Coordinating amendment to the Election Procedure proposal. H. Assessor,
>>> please resolve that one first.]
>>>
>>> Amend Rule 2127 to read as follows:
>>>
>>> A conditional vote on an Agoran decision is a vote which indicates
>>> a vote based on some condition(s). A conditional vote is evaluated
>>> at the end of the voting period and, rules to the contrary
>>> notwithstanding, is clearly specified if and only if the value of
>>> the condition(s) is/are determinate at the end of the voting
>>> period. If the conditional is clearly specified, and evaluates to
>>> a valid vote, it is counted as that vote; otherwise, it is counted
>>> as PRESENT.
>>>
>>> Any vote which is clearly expressed as a conditional, e.g. "FOR if
>>> <X> is true, AGAINST otherwise", is a valid conditional vote that
>>> evaluates as specified.
>>>
>>> A vote endorsing another person is equivalent to a conditional
>>> vote evaluating to the vote specified in that person's valid
>>> ballot on the decision, if any.
>>>
>>> For an instant runoff decision, a vote consisting of a list, one
>>> or more entries of which are valid conditional votes, and the
>>> remaining entries of which are valid options, is a valid
>>> conditional vote. Such a vote is evaluated by evaluating each
>>> conditional entry to a list of votes (or an empty list, if it
>>> evaluates to PRESENT either directly or indirectly), and then
>>> concatenating those lists with the specified valid options in the
>>> order they occurred in the original vote.
>>>
>>> [New conditional vote rule clearly specifies what conditional votes are
>>> valid, as well as providing for evaluation of conditional lists in
>>> instant runoff in the sensible way.]
>>>
>>> Amend Rule 2438 by replacing the paragraph describing Orange
>>> Ribbons with:
>>>
>>> Orange (O): When a proposal is adopted via an Agoran Decision on
>>> which no valid ballots were AGAINST (after evaluating
>>> conditionals), its proposer earns an Orange Ribbon.
>>>
>>> Award G. a Transparent Ribbon.
>>>
>>> [I accept that it's fair that this may not actually be a problem,
>>> but clarifying it and converging gamestate does not hurt.]
>>>
>>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>> ID: 7823
>>> Title: Another Economy Fix Attempt
>>> Adoption index: 1.0
>>> Author: Gaelan
>>> Co-authors:
>>>
>>>
>>> Create a power-1 rule titled "Keep it up" with the following text:
>>> ===
>>> If an action defined entirely by the rules that would otherwise be
>>> POSSIBLE for a player to perform is IMPOSSIBLE due to Agora having a
>>> low shiny balance, that player may win the game with 2 Days Notice.
>>> Upon doing so, half of all player's shiny balances (rounded down) are
>>> transferred to Agora.
>>> ===
>>>
>>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>> ID: 7825
>>> Title: Safety Regulations v2
>>> Adoption index: 3.0
>>> Author: Aris
>>> Co-author(s): Alexis
>>>
>>>
>>> Amend Rule 2493, "Regulations", by
>>>
>>> * Replacing every instance of the word "instrument" with the words "textual
>>> entity"; and
>>> * Amending the second paragraph to read in full "A regulation must be
>>> authorized by at least one rule in order for it to exist. A regulation
>>> has
>>> effect on the game (only) insofar as the rule or rules that authorized it
>>> permit it to have effect. If reasonably possible, a regulation should be
>>> interpreted so as to defer to other rules. The procedure for resolving
>>> conflict between regulations is the same as it is for rules (for the
>>> purposes of resolving conflicts only, a regulation is treated as if it
>>> had the power of its least powerful parent rule)."
>>>
>>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>> ID: 7826
>>> Title: Deregulation
>>> Adoption index: 3.0
>>> Author: Alexis
>>> Co-author(s):
>>>
>>>
>>> Repeal Rule 2493 (Regulations).
>>> Repeal Rule 2494 (The Regkeepor).
>>> Amend Rule 2464 (Tournaments) to read as follows:
>>>
>>> A Tournament is a sub-game of Agora specifically sanctioned
>>> to be initiated as a tournament by the Rules. If a winner of a
>>> tournament is determined within 4 weeks of its initiation, that
>>> person or persons win the game, otherwise the tournament
>>> concludes with no winner.
>>>
>>> In a timely fashion after the start of June 1 of each year,
>>> the Herald SHALL propose a set of Regulations governing a
>>> Birthday Tournament for that year; the Herald CAN also
>>> delegate the responsibility for creating or running the
>>> tournament to another player, with that player's consent.
>>>
>>> The Birthday Tournament's regulations SHOULD be such that all
>>> persons who choose to participate have a fair chance of winning
>>> the tournament (according to its regulations), and a winner
>>> SHOULD be expected within 2-3 weeks following the tournament's
>>> initiation.
>>>
>>> After adequate time for discussion of the Birthday Tournament's
>>> regulations, the Herald (or delegate) CAN initiate a sanctioned
>>> tournament with a specified, finalized set of regulations,
>>> Without 3 Objections. The initiation SHOULD be timed to
>>> coincide with Agora's Birthday.
>>>
>>> Repeal Rule 2495 (The Birthday Tournament).
>>>
>>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>> ID: 7827
>>> Title: Estate Auction Fix
>>> Adoption index: 2.0
>>> Author: V.J. Rada
>>> Co-author(s): G.
>>>
>>>
>>> Amend rule 2491 by replacing the text "transfer the auctioned
>>> Estate to the winner by announcement, by paying Agora the amount of
>>> the bid, or by causing the winning Organization" with "transfer the
>>> auctioned Estate to the winner by announcement and by either paying
>>> Agora the amount of the bid or causing the winning Organization"
>>>
>>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>> ID: 7828
>>> Title: no we can't
>>> Adoption index: 3.0
>>> Author: G.
>>> Co-author(s):
>>>
>>>
>>> Amend Rule 2125 (Regulated Actions) by replacing:
>>>
>>> Restricted Actions CAN only be performed as described by the Rules.
>>>
>>> with:
>>> A Restricted Action CAN only be performed as described by the Rules, and
>>> only
>>> using the methods explicitly specified in the Rules for performing the
>>> given
>>> action.
>>>
>>> [this over-arching protection means in general, "by announcement"
>>> is NOT implied. I just want to put this in place and absolutely
>>> clarify the ruleset if it passes, and we can add the MMI change later
>>> if desired].
>>>
>>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>> ID: 7829
>>> Title: Consumerism
>>> Adoption index: 1.0
>>> Author: V.J. Rada
>>> Co-author(s):
>>>
>>>
>>> Create a new rule called "Spend Spend Spend" with the text
>>>
>>> {{Monthly, the Secretary CAN and SHALL transfer the Shinies of any player
>>> who
>>> has not spent any shinies in the previous month to Agora.}}
>>>
>>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>> ID: pp1
>>> Title: Faster Auctions
>>> Adoption index: 2.0
>>> Author: o
>>> Co-author(s):
>>>
>>>
>>> Amend rule 2491 ("Estate Auctions") by replacing the phrase "At the start
>>> of each month" with "At the start of each week".
>>>
>>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>> ID: 7824
>>> Title: Contracts v8
>>> Adoption index: 3.0
>>> Author: Aris
>>> Co-author(s): o, G., ais523, Gaelan, 天火狐, CuddleBeam, V.J Rada, Trigon,
>>> Alexis, P.S.S.
>>>
>>>
>>> Lines beginning with hashmarks ("#") and comments in square brackets ("[]")
>>> have no effect on the behavior of this proposal. They are not part of any
>>> rules
>>> created or amended herein, and may be considered for all game purposes to
>>> have been removed before its resolution.
>>>
>>> # 1 Cleanup & Miscellaneous
>>> # 1.1 Gamestate Cleanup
>>>
>>> Destroy each organization.
>>>
>>> Destroy each agency.
>>>
>>> For the purposes of this proposal, neither pledges nor rules are contracts.
>>>
>>> Destroy each contract. [Just in case.]
>>>
>>> # 1.2 Organization, Secretary, and Economic Cleanup
>>> # 1.2.1 Repeal Organizations
>>>
>>> Repeal rule 2459 ("Organizations").
>>>
>>> Repeal rule 2461 ("Death and Birth of Organizations").
>>>
>>> Repeal rule 2460 ("Organizational Restructuring").
>>>
>>> Repeal rule 2457 ("Lockout").
>>>
>>> Repeal rule 2458 ("Invoking Lockout").
>>>
>>> Repeal rule 2462 ("Bankruptcy").
>>>
>>> # 1.2.2 Change Secretary to Treasuror
>>>
>>> Amend rule 2456 ("The Secretary") by
>>>
>>> * Changing its title to "The Treasuror", then by
>>> * Replacing its text, entirely, with:
>>>
>>> {{{
>>> The Treasuror is an office, and the recordkeepor of Shinies.
>>>
>>> The Treasuror's weekly report also includes:
>>>
>>> 1. the current Floating Value, and all derived values
>>> defined by the Rules.
>>> 2. the list of all public classes of assets.
>>>
>>> }}}
>>>
>>> Make o the Treasuror.
>>>
>>> Amend the following rules, in order, by replacing the word
>>> "Secretary" with the word "Treasuror" wherever it appears:
>>>
>>> * Rule 2487 ("Shiny Supply Level")
>>> * Rule 2498 ("Economic Wins")
>>> * Rule 2497 ("Floating Value")
>>>
>>> # 1.2.3 General Economy Fixes/Cleanup
>>>
>>> Amend rule 2489 ("Estates") by replacing the first sentence with:
>>>
>>> {{{
>>> An Estate is a type of indestructible liquid asset.
>>> }}}
>>>
>>> Amend rule 2491 ("Estate Auctions") by replacing its text,
>>> entirely, with:
>>>
>>> {{{
>>> At the start of each month, if Agora owns at least one
>>> Estate, the Surveyor CAN and SHALL put one Estate that is owned by
>>> Agora up for auction by announcement. Each auction ends
>>> seven days after it begins.
>>>
>>> During an auction, any player or contract may bid a number of Shinies
>>> by announcement, provided that the bid is higher than all
>>> previously-placed bids in the same auction.
>>>
>>> If, at the end of the auction, there is a single highest bid,
>>> then the player or contract who placed that bid wins the auction.
>>> The winner CAN cause Agora to transfer the auctioned Estate to emself
>>> by announcement, if e pays Agora the amount of the bid for the explicit
>>> and sole purpose of fulfilling this requirement. The person who
>>> placed the bid SHALL see to it that this is done in a timely fashion.
>>> }}}
>>>
>>> Amend rule 2483 ("Economics") by replacing its text, entirely, with:
>>>
>>> {{{
>>> Shinies (singular "shiny", abbreviated "sh.") are an
>>> indestructible liquid currency, and the official currency
>>> of Agora. The Treasuror is the recordkeepor for shinies.
>>>
>>> }}}
>>>
>>>
>>> # 1.3 Agency Cleanup
>>>
>>> Repeal Rule 2467 ("Agencies")
>>>
>>> Repeal Rule 2468 ("Superintendent")
>>>
>>> # 1.4 Define Extricability
>>>
>>> [Note that I do not believe this section makes any substantive changes on
>>> its
>>> own. Because of the volume of concerns raised about restricting by
>>> announcement
>>> conditionals, this section only contains definitions.]
>>>
>>> Create a new power 3.0 rule entitled "Conditionals and Extricability", with
>>> the
>>> following text:
>>>
>>> A conditional is any textual structure that attempts to make a statement
>>> (the
>>> substrate) affecting any part or aspect of the gamestate, or the
>>> permissibility, possibility, or effect of any action affecting such a part
>>> or
>>> aspect, dependent on the truth value or other state of a textual structure
>>> (the condition). The condition is said to be "affixed" to the substrate
>>> (inverse "to be conditional upon").
>>>
>>> A condition is inextricable if it is unclear, ambiguous, circular,
>>> inconsistent, paradoxical, depends on information that is indeterminate, or
>>> is impossible or unreasonably difficult to determine, or otherwise
>>> requires an
>>> unreasonable effort to resolve; otherwise it is extricable. A conditional
>>> is
>>> inextricable if its condition is inextricable; otherwise it is extricable.
>>> A
>>> player SHOULD NOT use an inextricable conditional for any purpose.
>>>
>>> An action is said to be "subject to" a conditional if its possibility,
>>> permissibility, or effect (depending on context) is determined by the
>>> conditional. A value is said to be subject to a conditional of the state
>>> of the value is determined by the conditional.
>>>
>>> Create a new power 3.0 rule entitled "Determinacy", with the following text:
>>>
>>> If a value CANNOT be reasonably determined (without circularity or paradox)
>>> from information reasonably available, or if it alternates indefinitely
>>> between values, then the value is considered to be indeterminate, otherwise
>>> it is determinate.
>>>
>>> Amend Rule 1023, "Common Definitions", by (please note that these actions
>>> are severable):
>>>
>>> * removing the third item of the top level list;
>>> * renumbering appropriately; and
>>> * changing its title to "Agoran Time"
>>>
>>>
>>> # 1.5 General-purpose Rules
>>>
>>> Reenact Rule 1586, "Definition and Continuity of Entities" (Power = 2), with
>>> the text:
>>>
>>> If multiple rules attempt to define an entity with the same name, then they
>>> refer to the same entity. A rule-defined entity's name CANNOT be changed to
>>> be the same as another rule-defined entity's name.
>>>
>>> A rule, contract, or regulation that refers to an entity by name refers to
>>> the
>>> entity that had that name when the rule first came to include that
>>> reference,
>>> even if the entity's name has since changed.
>>>
>>> If the entity that defines another entity is amended such that it no longer
>>> defines the second entity, then the second entity and its attributes cease
>>> to
>>> exist.
>>>
>>> If the entity that defines another entity is amended such that it defines
>>> the second entity both before and after the amendment, but with different
>>> attributes, then the second entity and its attributes continue to exist to
>>> whatever extent is possible under the new definitions.
>>>
>>> [Note to the Rulekeepor:
>>>
>>> Created by Proposal 2481, Feb. 16 1996
>>> Amended(1) by Proposal 2795 (Andre), Jan. 30 1997, substantial
>>> Amended(2) by Proposal 3999 (harvel), May 2 2000
>>> Power changed from 1 to 2 by Proposal 3999 (harvel), May 2 2000
>>> Amended(3) by Proposal 5077 (Murphy), 18 July 2007
>>> Amended(4) by Proposal 5723 (Murphy), 7 October 2008
>>> Amended(5) by Proposal 5836 (Murphy), 12 October 2008
>>> Amended(6) by cleaning (comex), 26 January 2009
>>> Amended(7) by Proposal 6650 (coppro), 10 March 2010
>>> Amended(8) by Proposal 6981 (Murphy, omd), 10 April 2011
>>> Repealed by Proposal 7614 (G., omd), 13 January 2014
>>> ]
>>>
>>> Create a new power 3 rule entitled "Consent", with the following text:
>>>
>>> A person gives consent (syn. consents) to an action when e, acting as
>>> emself,
>>> publicly states that e agrees to the action. This agreement may be implied,
>>> but only if it is reasonably clear from context that the person wanted the
>>> agreement to take place.
>>>
>>> # 1.6 Random Amendments
>>>
>>> Amend Rule 869, "How to Join and Leave Agora", by changing its last
>>> paragraph to
>>> read:
>>>
>>> The Rules CANNOT compel non-players to act without their express or
>>> reasonably
>>> implied consent. The rules CANNOT compel players to unduly harass
>>> non-players.
>>> A non-person CANNOT be a player, rules to the contrary notwithstanding.
>>>
>>>
>>> Amend Rule 2139, "The Registrar", by changing the sentence "The Registrar is
>>> also responsible for tracking any switches that would otherwise lack an
>>> officer
>>> to track them, unless the switch is defined as untracked." to read "The
>>> Registrar is also responsible for tracking any switches, defined in a rule,
>>> that would otherwise lack an officer to track them, unless the switch is
>>> defined
>>> as untracked."
>>>
>>> Amend Rule 2466, "Acting on Behalf", by changing it to read in full:
>>>
>>> When a rule allows one person (the agent) to act on behalf of another
>>> (the principal) to perform an action, that agent CAN perform the action if
>>> it
>>> is POSSIBLE for the principal to do so, taking into account any
>>> prerequisites
>>> for the action. If the enabling rule does not specify the mechanism by
>>> which
>>> the agent may do so, then the agent CAN perform the action in the same
>>> manner
>>> in which the principal CAN do so, with the additional requirement that the
>>> agent must, in the message in which the action is performed, uniquely
>>> identify
>>> the principal and that the action is being taken on behalf of that person.
>>>
>>> A person SHALL NOT act on behalf of another person if doing so causes the
>>> second person to violate the rules. A person CANNOT act on behalf of
>>> another
>>> person to do anything except perform a game action; in particular, a person
>>> CANNOT act on behalf of another person to send a message, only to perform
>>> specific actions that might be taken within a message.
>>>
>>> When an action is performed on behalf of a principal, then the
>>> action is considered for all game purposes to have been performed by the
>>> principal, unless a rule specifically states that it is treated differently
>>> for some purpose, in which case it is treated as described by that rule.
>>>
>>> Allowing a person to act on behalf of another person is secured at power
>>> 2.0.
>>> This rule takes precedence over any rule that would prohibit a person from
>>> taking an action, except that it defers to any rule that imposes
>>> limitations
>>> specifically on actions taken on behalf of another person.
>>>
>>>
>>> # 2 Contracts
>>> # 2.1 Core Contract Features
>>>
>>> Create a new power 2.5 rule, entitled "Contracts", with the following text:
>>>
>>> A contract is a ruleset-defined entity embodied in text. An entity can only
>>> become a contract through the appropriate ruleset defined procedures.
>>> Changes
>>> to the contract's text by rule defined mechanisms (including those
>>> delegated
>>> to the contract itself) do not change the identity of the contract.
>>>
>>> If any change to a contract's text, internal state, or other properties
>>> would
>>> cause them to become indeterminate and remain so for any non-infinitesimal
>>> amount of time, the change is canceled and does not occur.
>>>
>>> The following changes are secured at power 2.1: creating or modifying a
>>> contract or causing an entity to become a contract. [Note that,
>>> as a precaution, causing an entity to cease being a contract is not
>>> secured.]
>>>
>>> The properties of contracts, as defined by other rules, include the
>>> following:
>>>
>>> - Parties, persons who agree to be bound by and assume powers under
>>> the contract.
>>> - The ability to be amended or destroyed.
>>> - The ability to compel actions by their parties.
>>> - The ability to allow persons to take actions on the part of their
>>> parties.
>>> - The ability to define arbitrary classes of asset.
>>> - The ability to possess and control assets.
>>>
>>> Create a new power 2.5 rule, entitled "Parties to Contracts", with the
>>> following
>>> text:
>>>
>>> Each contract has an associated set of persons, known as the parties. The
>>> person who creates a contract is automatically a party. Other persons CAN
>>> become parties to a contract by announcement if the contract's text permits
>>> them to do so. Parties can leave a contract by announcement, ceasing being
>>> parties, if the contract's text permits them to do so. A contract CAN
>>> expel a
>>> party or group of parties by announcement, causing them to cease being
>>> parties.
>>>
>>> It is IMPOSSIBLE, by any means, for a person to become a party to a
>>> contract,
>>> for an contract to be created with a person as a party, or for an entity to
>>> become a contract with a person as a party, without that person's consent.
>>> This rule takes precedence over any rule that might make such a change
>>> possible.
>>>
>>> Create a power 2.5 rule entitled "Contract Lifecycle", with the
>>> following text:
>>>
>>> A person CAN create a contract by announcement by transferring 1 shiny to
>>> Agora, specifying the contract's text. A person SHALL NOT create more than
>>> X (where X is the contract limit) contracts per week by this method, and
>>> the
>>> Notary CAN destroy any excess (i.e. beyond the X permitted) contracts by
>>> announcement within 7 days of the contract's formation, but only if the
>>> contract(s) were excess at the time of their creation.
>>>
>>> The contract limit is an untracked singleton switch, defaulting to 3, with
>>> possible values of any integer between 3 and 7. The contract limit can be
>>> set to any valid value in a regulation promulgated by the Notary.
>>> The amendment limit is an untracked singleton switch, with possible values
>>> of integers greater than or equal to 5, or positive infinity (default).
>>> The amendment limit can be set in a regulation promulgated by the Notary.
>>>
>>> The person or persons who create a contract CAN and SHOULD also specify a
>>> name for the contract; if e does not do so, the Notary CAN and
>>> SHALL assign a name in a timely fashion.
>>>
>>> A contract CAN amend, destroy, or retitle itself by announcement. A player
>>> CAN amend, destroy, or retitle a contract without objection, even if its
>>> text denies em the ability to do so. Players SHOULD only use this mechanism
>>> to recover from situations where the contract is underspecified or has
>>> unintended effects.
>>>
>>> The Notary CAN by regulation stop the same contract from
>>> amending or retitling itself more than Y times (where Y is the amendment
>>> limit
>>> limit) combined times per Agoran day; e CANNOT stop a contract from being
>>> destroyed, or from being retitled or amended by any other means.
>>>
>>> If a contract has fulfilled its purpose, does not specify any gamestate
>>> affecting statements, or otherwise seems unlikely to be used, the Notary
>>> CAN and SHOULD destroy it with Agoran Consent. Any player CAN destroy a
>>> contract with 2 Agoran Consent. Players SHOULD NOT use the methods in this
>>> paragraph to further their private interests.
>>>
>>> If the possibility of any action defined by this rule is indeterminate, or
>>> is subject to a inextricable conditional, it is impossible.
>>>
>>>
>>> # 2.2 Powers of Contracts
>>>
>>> Create a new power 2.4 rule, entitled "Contracts as Agreements", with the
>>> following text:
>>>
>>> The text of a contract can specify obligations upon its parties. Parties to
>>> a contract SHALL abide by its terms, breaching them neither negligently nor
>>> deliberately. The fact that the action described by the contract is in
>>> violation of the rules is not a defense if the violative nature is
>>> reasonably clear from its text. If whether an action is permitted or
>>> forbidden
>>> by a contract is indeterminate or subject to an inextricable conditional,
>>> it is presumptively permitted.
>>>
>>> As an exception to the provisions of the previous paragraph and the
>>> circumstances in which cards would ordinarily be appropriate, a person
>>> awarding a card under this rule MAY and CAN validly consider the equitable
>>> interests of justice and interests of the game, including the importance of
>>> the observation of contracts, as a mitigating or aggravating circumstances
>>> when awarding a card. Such a person MAY, CAN validly, and SHOULD also
>>> consider
>>> the instructions of the contract or contracts in question when issuing a
>>> card.
>>>
>>>
>>> Create a new power 2.4 rule, entitled "Acting on Behalf via Contract", with
>>> the following text:
>>>
>>> If a rule says that a contract CAN do something by announcement, it is
>>> equivalent to saying that that any person CAN take that action by
>>> announcement
>>> if the contract's text says that e CAN do so under the circumstances; if
>>> whether the contract enables the person to do so is indeterminate, or is
>>> the
>>> subject of an inextricable conditional, the action is IMPOSSIBLE. A person
>>> SHALL NOT cause a contract to violate a rule using this method.
>>>
>>> If a rule specifies that a contract SHALL or SHALL NOT do something, each
>>> party to the contract SHALL ensure that the contract respectively does
>>> or does not do that thing.
>>>
>>> The text of a contract can permit persons to act on behalf of a party or
>>> group of parties. To do so, it must specify:
>>>
>>> a. Which of its parties can be acted on behalf of;
>>> b. What actions can be taken;
>>> c. Who can take the actions; and
>>> d. Any conditions or limitations upon the actions. If any such
>>> limitations or conditions are inextricable, the actions CANNOT be
>>> used.
>>>
>>> # 2.3 Contract Interpretation and Maintenance
>>>
>>> Create a new power 2.6 rule, entitled "Interpreting Contracts",
>>> with the following text:
>>>
>>> A contract should generally be interpreted according to its text, including
>>> any clauses giving directions for its interpretation or construction.
>>> Additionally, justice, the intent of the contract's parties, and the
>>> principles
>>> governing rule interpretation should be reasonably applied when
>>> interpreting
>>> a contract.
>>>
>>> A contract is subservient to the rules. Although a contract may specify
>>> obligations or powers beyond those created by the rules, a contract may not
>>> override the rules: in particular, any provision of a contract that would
>>> unreasonably violate an inalienable right of players and/or persons or
>>> cause any rule defined statement about the gamestate, or about the
>>> possibility
>>> of an action, to become false is void and without effect insofar as it does
>>> so.
>>>
>>> The following are protected actions:
>>>
>>> 1. Registering and deregistering;
>>> 2. Submitting, pending, or voting freely on a proposal, but only if the
>>> sole
>>> effect the proposal would have if adopted is to create, modify, or
>>> destroy
>>> a contract or group of contracts, or to cause an entity or group of
>>> entities to become or cease to be a contract or group of contracts;
>>> 3. Creating, destroying, or amending a contract, intending to do so, and
>>> supporting, objecting to, or resolving such an intent, except where the
>>> mechanism for destruction or amendment is created by the contract
>>> itself;
>>> 4. Making true statements about a contract;
>>> 5. Calling, judging, assigning, or freely discussing a CFJ;
>>> 6. Lawfully performing an official duty;
>>> 7. Objecting to or supporting an intent to perform an action while
>>> Speaker;
>>> 8. Using an executive order;
>>> 9. Making, amending, revoking or calling in a pledge; and
>>> 10. Any action affecting the status of a festival.
>>>
>>>
>>> Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, a contract CANNOT compel, forbid,
>>> or in any significant way alter, tamper with, or modify the performance of
>>> a protected action. A contract CANNOT punish a player for performing or
>>> failing protected action, or for doing so in a particular manner, except
>>> where it would otherwise be ILLEGAL. A contract also CANNOT enable a
>>> person to
>>> do any of the things prohibited to the contract by this paragraph. Insofar
>>> as
>>> a contract or a provision or clause of a contract contravenes the letter or
>>> clear intent of this rule, it is void and without effect.
>>>
>>> Create a new power 2.4 rule, entitled "Sustenance Payments", with following
>>> text:
>>>
>>> The Notary CAN, once a month, cause each contract that owns at least
>>> one shiny to transfer one shiny to Agora. E SHALL do so in the first week
>>> of every month. If a contract does not own at least one shiny, and is
>>> thus unable to make said payment, the Notary CAN and SHALL destroy
>>> it With Notice. If a contract becomes and remains able to pay before its
>>> destruction, the Notary CANNOT destroy it, and CAN and SHALL instead
>>> collect the shiny.
>>>
>>> The Notary CAN, by regulation, exempt a contract from the preceding
>>> paragraph.
>>> E SHALL NOT do so unless the contract seems to be in the public interest of
>>> Agora.
>>>
>>>
>>> Create a new power 1.0 rule, entitled "The Notary", with the following text:
>>>
>>> The Notary is an office, and the recordkeepor of contracts. The Notary's
>>> weekly report contains all contracts, including their name, text, and
>>> parties. The Notary's weekly report also contains the list of private
>>> classes
>>> of asset. The Notary is ENCOURAGED to list all changes to the information e
>>> tracks in eir report.
>>>
>>> Make o the Notary.
>>>
>>> # 3.0 Asset Changes
>>>
>>> Amend Rule 2166, "Assets", by changing it to read in full:
>>>
>>> An asset is an entity defined as such by a (a) rule, (b) authorized
>>> regulation, (c) group of rules and/or authorized regulations (but if such
>>> regulations modify a preexisting asset class defined by a rule or another
>>> title of regulations, they must be authorized specifically to do so by
>>> their
>>> parent rule), or (d) contract (hereafter its backing document), and
>>> existing
>>> solely because its backing document defines its existence. An asset's
>>> backing
>>> document can specify when and how that asset is created, destroyed, and
>>> transferred.
>>>
>>> Each asset has exactly one owner. If an asset would otherwise
>>> lack an owner, it is owned by Agora. If an asset's backing document
>>> restricts
>>> its ownership to a class of entities, then that asset CANNOT be gained by
>>> or
>>> transferred to an entity outside that class, and is destroyed if it is
>>> owned
>>> by an entity outside that class (except if it is owned by Agora, in which
>>> case
>>> any player CAN transfer or destroy it without objection). The restrictions
>>> in
>>> the previous sentence are subject to modification by its backing document.
>>>
>>> Unless modified by an asset's backing document, ownership of an asset is
>>> restricted to Agora, players, and contracts. As an exception to the last
>>> sentence, non-player persons are generally able to own assets defined by
>>> a contract they are a party to, subject to modification by the contract in
>>> question.
>>>
>>> A contract's text can specify whether or not that contract is
>>> willing to receive assets or a class of assets. Generally, a contract
>>> CANNOT
>>> be given assets it is unwilling to receive. If the contract is silent on
>>> the
>>> matter, or if its willingness is indeterminate or the subject of a
>>> inextricable conditional, the procedure to determine its willingness is as
>>> follows:
>>>
>>> 1. If the contract appears to anticipate being given assets, other than
>>> for
>>> sustenance (e.g. by authorizing parties to spend the contract's
>>> assets),
>>> then the contract is willing to receive all assets.
>>> 2. Otherwise, it is unwilling to receive all assets.
>>>
>>> The previous paragraph (including the list) notwithstanding, a contract
>>> CAN be given 1 shiny a month for its sustenance payment, so long as
>>> it never has more than 1 shiny at a time.
>>>
>>> The recordkeepor of a class of assets is the entity (if any)
>>> defined as such by, and bound by, its backing document. That
>>> entity's report includes a list of all instances of that class
>>> and their owners. This portion of that entity's report is
>>> self-ratifying. Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, a contract CANNOT
>>> oblige a person who isn't a member to record its internal state, nor is
>>> the default recordkeepor responsible for tracking a contract's internal
>>> state.
>>> For the purposes of this rule, the promulgator of a regulation is bound by
>>> it.
>>>
>>> An asset generally CAN be destroyed by its owner by
>>> announcement, subject to modification by its backing document. An
>>> indestructible asset is one defined as such by it backing document, and
>>> CANNOT
>>> be destroyed except by a rule, other than this one, specifically addressing
>>> the destruction of indestructible assets or that asset in particular; any
>>> other asset is destructible. In circumstances where another asset would be
>>> destroyed, an indestructible asset is generally transferred to Agora,
>>> subject
>>> to modification by its backing document and the intervention of other
>>> rules.
>>>
>>> To "lose" an asset is to have it destroyed from one's
>>> possession; to "revoke" an asset from an entity is to destroy it
>>> from that entity's possession.
>>>
>>> An asset generally CAN be transferred (syn. paid, given) by announcement by
>>> its owner to another entity, subject to modification by its
>>> backing document. A fixed asset is one defined as such by its backing
>>> document, and CANNOT be transferred; any other asset is liquid.
>>>
>>> When a rule indicates transferring an amount that is not a natural number,
>>> the specified amount is rounded up to the nearest natural number.
>>>
>>> A currency is a class of asset defined as such by its backing document.
>>> Instances of a currency with the same owner are fungible.
>>>
>>> The "x balance of an entity", where x is a currency, is the number of x
>>> that
>>> entity possesses. If a rule, proposal, or other competent authority
>>> attempts
>>> to increase or decrease the balance of an entity without specifying a
>>> source
>>> or destination, then the currency is created or destroyed as needed.
>>>
>>> When a player causes one or more balances to change, e is ENCOURAGED
>>> to specify the resulting balance(s). Players SHOULD NOT specify
>>> inaccurate balances.
>>>
>>> Where it resolves ambiguity, the asset or currency being referred to is the
>>> currency designated as "Agora's official currency", if there is one.
>>>
>>> An asset or class of assets is private, rather than public, if its
>>> backing document is a contract.
>>>
>>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> From V.J. Rada
--
>From V.J. Rada
