On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 07:05, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Protection Racket has been in a whirlwind lately; I ask BobTHJ or
> similar to give me the text if they know it as I am entirely unsure
> about its state and ais523 did not track the amendments for some reason.
>
I know i
On 19 Nov 2008, at 14:05, Elliott Hird wrote:
The Protection Racket has been in a whirlwind lately; I ask BobTHJ or
similar to give me the text if they know it as I am entirely unsure
about its state and ais523 did not track the amendments for some
reason.
OK, I know about all contracts apar
ehird wrote:
> On 19 Nov 2008, at 17:47, Ed Murphy wrote:
>
>> I really don't see someone with a long history of attempting scams
>> being
>> voted into the office that decides who gets first shot at adjudicating
>> the success or failure of scams. Of course, this may change as the
>> player p
On 19 Nov 2008, at 17:47, Ed Murphy wrote:
I really don't see someone with a long history of attempting scams
being
voted into the office that decides who gets first shot at adjudicating
the success or failure of scams. Of course, this may change as the
player population does.
FYI, I would
ehird wrote:
> Also, I decline my self-nomination for CotC. Want to get scripts running
> first.
I really don't see someone with a long history of attempting scams being
voted into the office that decides who gets first shot at adjudicating
the success or failure of scams. Of course, this may ch
ehird wrote:
> Also, I request a copy of the Werewolves contract test from whoever has
> it, as ais523 appears to be very behind on it too.
AFAIK, my message "Prep for Werewolves session #2" on November 11 was
accurate at the time; I then applied three patches on November 16.
6 matches
Mail list logo
