DIS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Promotor election

2010-09-08 Thread Ed Murphy
Wooble wrote: > On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> Well, this is broken... >> >> As required by Rule 107, since there is only 1 option, I end the >> voting period for the Promotor election. >> >> The option chosen would be FAILED QUORUM. The voting period is >> extended by

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Promotor Election is FAILING QUORUM

2009-06-21 Thread Benjamin Caplan
C-walker wrote: > Murphy wrote: >> Endorsement and denouncement were amended to carry an implicit >> "PRESENT if it would otherwise fail to evaluate to a valid option", >> but this does not apply to conditional votes in general, nor to >> ordered lists of election candidates in particular. > > Any

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Promotor Election is FAILING QUORUM

2009-06-21 Thread C-walker
Murphy wrote: > Endorsement and denouncement were amended to carry an implicit > "PRESENT if it would otherwise fail to evaluate to a valid option", > but this does not apply to conditional votes in general, nor to > ordered lists of election candidates in particular. Any reason why not? -- C-wa

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Promotor Election is FAILING QUORUM

2009-06-21 Thread Ed Murphy
Wooble wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Aaron Goldfein > wrote: >> Note: Yally voted "Yally, coppro," but neither could be the outcome. > > This is still a valid vote and should be counted toward quorum. See CFJ 2591. I think it's FALSE because the vote, when evaluated, fails to speci

DIS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Promotor Election is FAILING QUORUM

2009-06-21 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > Note: Yally voted "Yally, coppro," but neither could be the outcome. This is still a valid vote and should be counted toward quorum.

DIS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Promotor Election 2

2009-05-16 Thread Ed Murphy
Yally wrote: > I initiate an Agoran decision to decide the holder of the Promotor > office. The eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector > is the IADoP, and the candidates are coppro and Wooble (incumbent). I endorse Wooble. I vote for Wooble (this is effective iff the previous

DIS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Promotor Election Result

2009-03-31 Thread Ed Murphy
Goethe wrote: > coppro is selected. coppro is installed as promotor. coppro, are you going to continue using the PNP's scripts for recording proposals? (If not, then I need to rewrite my record-distribution form to scrape copy+pasted e-mails instead.)

Re: SPAM: DIS: Re: OFF: [IADOP] Promotor election

2008-08-15 Thread Elliott Hird
2008/8/15 ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 23:07 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote: >> How can you NOT vote PNP with this?: >> >> http://nomic.info/perlnomic/current-proposals/proposal.ais523.code_for_being_the_Agoran_Promotor > Heh, my email system even labeled that message as spam. Arg

Re: SPAM: DIS: Re: OFF: [IADOP] Promotor election

2008-08-15 Thread ais523
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 23:07 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote: > How can you NOT vote PNP with this?: > > http://nomic.info/perlnomic/current-proposals/proposal.ais523.code_for_being_the_Agoran_Promotor Heh, my email system even labeled that message as spam. Arguably, it was... -- ais523

DIS: Re: OFF: [IADOP] Promotor election

2008-08-15 Thread Elliott Hird
2008/8/15 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This message serves to initiate the Agoran Decision to choose the > holder of the Promotor office. > > The eligible voters are the active players, and the vote collector is the > IADOP. > > The valid options are: > * PerlNomic Partnership > * comex >

DIS: Re: OFF: [IADOP] Promotor election

2008-08-15 Thread ais523
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 13:55 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > This message serves to initiate the Agoran Decision to choose the > holder of the Promotor office. > > The eligible voters are the active players, and the vote collector is the > IADOP. > > The valid options are: > * PerlNomic Partnershi