Wooble wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Aaron Goldfein<aarongoldf...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Note: Yally voted "Yally, coppro," but neither could be the outcome. > > This is still a valid vote and should be counted toward quorum.
See CFJ 2591. I think it's FALSE because the vote, when evaluated, fails to specify which option is selected: "Yally, if e is a valid choice" (e wasn't) "otherwise coppro, if e is valid a choice" (e wasn't) and then you fall off the end, having failed to select any option. Endorsement and denouncement were amended to carry an implicit "PRESENT if it would otherwise fail to evaluate to a valid option", but this does not apply to conditional votes in general, nor to ordered lists of election candidates in particular.
