Fair enough.
> On May 25, 2017, at 11:30 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 25 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>> That format looks fine, although it would be nice if you listed the rule
>> number to apply the implication to.
>> (Is that the citations?)
>
> Would putting a symbol n
On Thu, 25 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> That format looks fine, although it would be nice if you listed the rule
> number to apply the implication to.
> (Is that the citations?)
Would putting a symbol next to a rule in Citations be sufficient and not-too
hard to scrape (to keep things
On Thu, 25 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> How does the current CFJ database work? Is it plain HTML, or generated
> somehow? If you already have the files used for that, then you could just go
> with that.
Each case log is stored in an individual file (a single directory):
https://faculty.w
How does the current CFJ database work? Is it plain HTML, or generated somehow?
If you already have the files used for that, then you could just go with that.
That format looks fine, although it would be nice if you listed the rule number
to apply the implication to. (Is that the citations?) Al
On Thu, 25 May 2017, Quazie wrote:
> CFJ db request: Any way we can add search? What's your backend look like so
> someone might be able to help?
> Not being able to search CFJ body text has made it harder to use than some
> prior CFJ DBs.
I agree. I wrote a rudimentary search script that's
CFJ db request: Any way we can add search? What's your backend look like
so someone might be able to help? Not being able to search CFJ body text
has made it harder to use than some prior CFJ DBs.
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:24 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 25 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrot
On Thu, 25 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> I'd love if you could place these annotations somewhere my FLR script can
> access.
> I'll try and send you a file with the old annotations I parsed out from the
> FLR tonight.
I will; for now I'll put a single index file or page (and may wait until
On Thu, 25 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> I disagree with the citation of CFJ 3469, I explicitly found that they could
> not be held by non-persons,
> but if they were awarded to persons then they exist and must be tracked. The
> rest look fine to me and I like the
> idea o
Where should annotations be placed for maximal accessibility?
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> I'd love if you could place these annotations somewhere my FLR script can
> access. I'll try and send you a file with the old annotations I
I'd love if you could place these annotations somewhere my FLR script can
access. I'll try and send you a file with the old annotations I parsed out from
the FLR tonight.
Gaelan
> On May 25, 2017, at 2:06 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> [Comments on the below sections welcome. If this is l
I disagree with the citation of CFJ 3469, I explicitly found that they
could not be held by non-persons, but if they were awarded to persons then
they exist and must be tracked. The rest look fine to me and I like the
idea of keeping this on the case record. Now that I see what these should
look li
> Question: should implications/citations be included in the case logs?
I think it would be a good idea to facilitate looking for things quickly.
天火狐
On 25 May 2017 at 05:06, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> [Comments on the below sections welcome. If this is liked, I invite
> judges to
> include i
12 matches
Mail list logo
