Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] Court Gazette

[Kerim Aydin]

On Thu, 25 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: 
> That format looks fine, although it would be nice if you listed the rule 
> number to apply the implication to. 
> (Is that the citations?)

Would putting a symbol next to a rule in Citations be sufficient and not-too 
hard to scrape (to keep things compact
for humans).  e.g.

CITATIONS
     R101/23(*), R234/42, CFJ 4566

with the understanding that the (*) might not always be there, not all 
implications map to a specific rule.