2010/10/11 :
> That statement still depends on its own truth value, just indirectly.
Due to Rule 2215, it would be illegal for me to make an unqualified
public statement consisting of the following string (expect with the
number 3000 incremented), followed by a quotation mark, followed by
the sam
That statement still depends on its own truth value, just indirectly.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 11, 2010, at 3:15 PM, Warrigal wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:22 PM, omd wrote:
>> Maybe all recursive statements should just be considered
>> indeterminate, regardless of how they would come ou
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:22 PM, omd wrote:
> Maybe all recursive statements should just be considered
> indeterminate, regardless of how they would come out if we attempted
> to break them apart?
Due to Rule 2215, it would be illegal for me to make an unqualified
public statement consisting of th
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2878
>
> === CFJ 2878 (Interest Index = 0)
>
> Due to Rule 2215, it would be illegal for me to make an
> unqualified public statement that is i
4 matches
Mail list logo
