That statement still depends on its own truth value, just indirectly. Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 11, 2010, at 3:15 PM, Warrigal <ihope12...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:22 PM, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Maybe all recursive statements should just be considered >> indeterminate, regardless of how they would come out if we attempted >> to break them apart? > > Due to Rule 2215, it would be illegal for me to make an unqualified > public statement consisting of the following string, followed by a > quotation mark, followed by the string again, followed by another > quotation mark: "Due to Rule 2215, it would be illegal for me to make > an unqualified public statement consisting of the following string, > followed by a space, followed by a quotation mark, followed by the > string again, followed by another quotation mark: " > > ―Tanner L. Swett
