Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2610 judged TRUE by allispaul

2009-06-24 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> Hmm, there's two possible ways an incorrect election notice can be VALID. >> (1) It can be VALID in initiating an election, even though it's incorrect >> in some specified detail; but the platonic "

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2610 judged TRUE by allispaul

2009-06-24 Thread Ed Murphy
G. wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote: >> Judge allispaul's Arguments: >> Importantly, a valid Notice of Violation has the >> effects it describes. CFJ 2481 and the associated cases are of note >> here: though the NoV's in question were certainly incorrect, they were >> valid and had t

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2610 judged TRUE by allispaul

2009-06-24 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Hmm, there's two possible ways an incorrect election notice can be VALID. > (1) It can be VALID in initiating an election, even though it's incorrect > in some specified detail; but the platonic "correct" information governed in > the rules is w

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2610 judged TRUE by allispaul

2009-06-24 Thread Paul VanKoughnett
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote: >> Judge allispaul's Arguments: >> Importantly, a valid Notice of Violation has the >> effects it describes.  CFJ 2481 and the associated cases are of note >> here: though the NoV's in question were certai

DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2610 judged TRUE by allispaul

2009-06-24 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote: > Judge allispaul's Arguments: > Importantly, a valid Notice of Violation has the > effects it describes. CFJ 2481 and the associated cases are of note > here: though the NoV's in question were certainly incorrect, they were > valid and had the effect of crea