Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2107b assigned to OscarMeyr, Murphy, root

2008-09-20 Thread ais523
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 18:05 -0400, ihope wrote: > But I might as well be more specific. It's inappropriate on CFJs 1980 > and 1982 because paradox escalation, being bad for the game, is > prevented by rule 217. Paradox escalation isn't bad for the game, because we have a CFJ judgement of UNDECIDABL

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2107b assigned to OscarMeyr, Murphy, root

2008-09-16 Thread ihope
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/9/16 ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> It is sometimes appropriate. >> >> --Ivan Hope CXXVII >> > > Alright. So... why did you say it wasn't? :P Because I believed it was never appropriate at the time. --Ivan Hope CXXVII

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2107b assigned to OscarMeyr, Murphy, root

2008-09-16 Thread Elliott Hird
2008/9/16 ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It is sometimes appropriate. > > --Ivan Hope CXXVII > Alright. So... why did you say it wasn't? :P

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2107b assigned to OscarMeyr, Murphy, root

2008-09-16 Thread ihope
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/9/16 ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> No longer necessary, as CFJ 2107 is done. >> >> --Ivan Hope CXXVII >> > > And? I would still like an answer. It is sometimes appropriate. --Ivan Hope CXXVII

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2107b assigned to OscarMeyr, Murphy, root

2008-09-16 Thread Elliott Hird
2008/9/16 ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > No longer necessary, as CFJ 2107 is done. > > --Ivan Hope CXXVII > And? I would still like an answer.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2107b assigned to OscarMeyr, Murphy, root

2008-09-09 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 8:24 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I don't think I made any commentary to agora-business (check >> agora-discussion archives for my brief old considerings). But >> basically, the record in 21

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2107b assigned to OscarMeyr, Murphy, root

2008-09-08 Thread Ed Murphy
OscarMeyr wrote: > I don't see any commentary from H. Trial Judge woggle in the > reevaluation of CFJ 2107. Is the COTC database lagging me out again? woggle is correct, there wasn't any in a-b: http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2008-September/013470.html

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2107b assigned to OscarMeyr, Murphy, root

2008-09-08 Thread ihope
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think I made any commentary to agora-business (check > agora-discussion archives for my brief old considerings). But > basically, the record in 2107a suggested to me that the GUILTY > judgment was believed correct by

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2107b assigned to OscarMeyr, Murphy, root

2008-09-08 Thread Charles Reiss
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 16:09, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't see any commentary from H. Trial Judge woggle in the reevaluation of > CFJ 2107. Is the COTC database lagging me out again? I don't think I made any commentary to agora-business (check agora-discussion archives fo

DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2107b assigned to OscarMeyr, Murphy, root

2008-09-08 Thread Benjamin Schultz
I don't see any commentary from H. Trial Judge woggle in the reevaluation of CFJ 2107. Is the COTC database lagging me out again? - Benjamin Schultz KE3OM OscarMeyr