On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think I made any commentary to agora-business (check > agora-discussion archives for my brief old considerings). But > basically, the record in 2107a suggested to me that the GUILTY > judgment was believed correct by the appeals panel (and it seems the > appeals panel certainly had access to ihope's arguments that relating > to eir alleged belief that UNDECIDABLE was never a valid judgment), > and so I did not believe it would've been appropriate to overturn it.
Surely you understand that REMAND and AFFIRM are very different things. --Ivan Hope CXXVII
