On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:18 PM, ais523 wrote:
>
> Get well soon, ais.
>
> If there is no objection, I intend to deputize for ais523 and appoint omd as
> Speaker.
Time marched on a little; I deputized last week, now ais523 is Speaker and I am
P.
On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 22:46 +0100, Luis Ressel wrote:
> There's not much going on these days; let's try to revive Agora!
>
> @ais523: The Speaker office is vacant, could you please appoint a new
> one? omd and youself are eligible.
For anyone wondering what happened, I've been ill for mo
I object. (However, I'm definitely not treating Agora right good
currently, much less forever.)
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Wes Contreras wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 1:51 PM, omd wrote:
>> I intend, without objection, to make each of the following players inactive:
>> FSX
>> Ienpw II
I object to making me inactive.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 2:47 PM, omd wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to make Henri inactive.
> I intend, without objection, to make Ienpw III inactive.
>
> (As a reminder to the players in question, it is normal to object if
> you don't want to be inactive.
And I'm back. So yeah. =P
~ Roujo
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:03 PM, omd wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> I intend, without objection, to make Droowl inactive.
>> I intend, without objection, to make Roujo inactive.
>
> I object to both, in an attempt to a
On 27 June 2011 03:37, omd wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Pavitra
> wrote:
>> On 06/26/2011 09:03 PM, omd wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Charles Walker
>>> wrote:
I intend, without objection, to make Droowl inactive.
I intend, without objection, to make Roujo
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Pavitra wrote:
> On 06/26/2011 09:03 PM, omd wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Charles Walker
>> wrote:
>>> I intend, without objection, to make Droowl inactive.
>>> I intend, without objection, to make Roujo inactive.
>>
>> I object to both, in an attem
On 06/26/2011 09:03 PM, omd wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> I intend, without objection, to make Droowl inactive.
>> I intend, without objection, to make Roujo inactive.
>
> I object to both, in an attempt to artificially raise the quorum.
Deliberately failin
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> Or, since everyone was under the impression (including Sgeo) that Sgeo
> was inactive, you could just leave him off the list of players and let
> it self-ratify.
Considering it was pointed out to me that he was not, in fact,
deregistered, th
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 06:37, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Wooble wrote:
>>
>>> Having received no objections, I deregister Sgeo.
>>
>> CoE: This is ineffective, as Sgeo became active on or about
>> 21 October 2009 and has remained active since the
Wooble wrote:
> Have the quorum numbers been considering Yally active all this time?
Sgeo, but yes. I never caught it before because Sgeo always objected
before (so there was nothing for me to record), and only caught it this
time because the draft CotC report disagreed (at which point I checked
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Also, git. :P
>
> Will it run on Red Hat 9? I'm using TortoiseSVN as a front end.
Git's very simple. It runs almost anywhere.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you.
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 15:45 -0400, comex wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Also, git. :P
> >
> > Will it run on Red Hat 9? I'm using TortoiseSVN as a front end.
>
> I don't know, but git is nice. If all recordkeepors used a
> distributed VCS (git
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Also, git. :P
>
> Will it run on Red Hat 9? I'm using TortoiseSVN as a front end.
I don't know, but git is nice. If all recordkeepors used a
distributed VCS (git, hg, monotone, doesn't matter which as long as
everyone uses
tusho wrote:
> 2008/8/11 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Assessor and Rulekeepor might not be so bad, now I've finally gotten
>> around to wrapping my head around Subversion. Unfortunately, my server
>> is too old to support the server end. Due to Rule 1450, someone else
>> will need to serve
2008/8/11 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Assessor and Rulekeepor might not be so bad, now I've finally gotten
> around to wrapping my head around Subversion. Unfortunately, my server
> is too old to support the server end. Due to Rule 1450, someone else
> will need to serve as Promotor.
You ca
pikhq wrote:
> On 13:54 Mon 11 Aug , Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I go on hold.
>> Does anyone want to be Registrar? I'm required to make a nomination
>> as soon as possible, and I'm fairly likely to just nominate every
>>
On 13:54 Mon 11 Aug , Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I go on hold.
>
> Does anyone want to be Registrar? I'm required to make a nomination
> as soon as possible, and I'm fairly likely to just nominate every
> single player and
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I go on hold.
Does anyone want to be Registrar? I'm required to make a nomination
as soon as possible, and I'm fairly likely to just nominate every
single player and install the one who doesn't notice in time to refuse
eir no
On 9/17/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hereby submit the following proposal:
>
> Lie Down
> AI: 1
> {
> BobTHJ's posture is flipped to Supine.
> }
This proposal should really be disinterested.
-root
On 9/17/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried to do so, but was not successful.
>
> I hereby submit the following proposal:
>
> Lie Down
> AI: 1
> {
> BobTHJ's posture is flipped to Supine.
> }
You're currently sitting; you can flip your posture to supine without
a proposal right no
On 9/16/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/16/07, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I announce my intent to make BobTHJ inactive without objection.
> >
>
> I vote OBJECT. I don't have much time but I'm still here.
Ah, well, at least make yourself ineligible to judge if you don't
On 7/9/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 08 July 2007, Zefram wrote:
> Primo Corporation is overdue to judge CFJ 1688 and CFJ 1694. I
> therefore intend to make Primo Corporation inactive, without objection.
>
I also object.
I am away for the week, but I beleive a Primo issue has
On 5/25/07, Michael Slone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/25/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> E hasn't posted since March. Anybody know where e's gone to? E's
> needed in an administrative capacity at the Dwarf Fortress wiki, and
> apparently e's not responding to emails either.
E ha
On 5/25/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
E hasn't posted since March. Anybody know where e's gone to? E's
needed in an administrative capacity at the Dwarf Fortress wiki, and
apparently e's not responding to emails either.
E has responded to emails from me as recently as last week.
-
25 matches
Mail list logo
