On 27 June 2011 03:37, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Pavitra <celestialcognit...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On 06/26/2011 09:03 PM, omd wrote: >>> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Charles Walker >>> <charles.w.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I intend, without objection, to make Droowl inactive. >>>> I intend, without objection, to make Roujo inactive. >>> >>> I object to both, in an attempt to artificially raise the quorum. >> >> Deliberately failing quorum is bad style, even for a game with a long >> tradition of blatant trolling. > > That's not really what I'm doing; the current quorum is much too > low... although it's basically fixed at 5 anyway and my actions are > very unlikely to affect it. >
At the moment quorum is roughly N/3 anyway - do you think a third is too low in general? -- Charles Walker
