On 30 June 2013 22:15, omd wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Sean Hunt
> wrote:
>> I CFJ on {If omd fails to report a list of alliances by the end of the
>> day today, e will in doing so forfeit eir Registrar Salary for the
>> month of June.}
>
> Why exactly do we have both parties and a
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Pavitra wrote:
> On 06/15/2011 12:13 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Kerim Aydin
> > wrote:
> >> I intend to deputize to Rotate the Bench.
> >>
> >> Hmm.
> >>
> >> Proto-CFJ for discussion (not CFJ for obvious reasons - need a justiciar!):
> >>
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> H. Murphy, would it be possible to somehow annotate CFJ 1776 in the
> database so that doing a statement text search for "rotating the
> bench" would make it show up?
I don't know if anyone reads those things, but I just updated the FLR
annot
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > I intend to deputize to Rotate the Bench.
> >
> > Hmm.
> >
> > Proto-CFJ for discussion (not CFJ for obvious reasons - need a justiciar!):
> >
> > It is possible to deputize to Rotate The Bench.
>
On 06/15/2011 12:13 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> I intend to deputize to Rotate the Bench.
>>
>> Hmm.
>>
>> Proto-CFJ for discussion (not CFJ for obvious reasons - need a justiciar!):
>>
>> It is possible to deputize to Rotate The Bench.
>
> CF
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I intend to deputize to Rotate the Bench.
>
> Hmm.
>
> Proto-CFJ for discussion (not CFJ for obvious reasons - need a justiciar!):
>
> It is possible to deputize to Rotate The Bench.
CFJ 1776 states (using dated terminology) that it is possib
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, omd wrote:
> The language about implementing provisions was added in 594/3, by
> Proposal 3445 in 1997 (the ruleset immediately before, according to
> the history in agora_zefram0, did not contain the word "implemented").
Ah yes, I see, 594/4 perturbed it for the town fountai
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Charles Walker wrote:
>> > take effect
>> > 1. To become operative, as under law or regulation.
>> > 2. To produce the desired reaction.
>
> H. Rulekeepor omd,
>
> Is it possible to search all 13K versions of your rules a
On Jun 3, 2011, at 1:44 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> If the option selected by Agora on this decision is ADOPTED,
>> then the proposal is adopted, and unless other rules prevent it
>> from taking effect, its power is set to the minimum of four and
>> its adoption index, and then
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Charles Walker wrote:
> > take effect
> > 1. To become operative, as under law or regulation.
> > 2. To produce the desired reaction.
H. Rulekeepor omd,
Is it possible to search all 13K versions of your rules at once? The
following text is in R594/3 in the oldest FLR in the
On 3 June 2011 20:35, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:36 PM, woggle wrote:
>> > [This time from my subscribed e-mail.]
>> >
>> > On 6/3/11 11:10 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> >> On 06/03/11 10:47, Charles Walker wrote:
>> >>> What else does a p
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:36 PM, woggle wrote:
> > [This time from my subscribed e-mail.]
> >
> > On 6/3/11 11:10 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> >> On 06/03/11 10:47, Charles Walker wrote:
> >>> What else does a proposal do when it takes effect?
> >>>
> >>
> >>
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:36 PM, woggle wrote:
> [This time from my subscribed e-mail.]
>
> On 6/3/11 11:10 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> On 06/03/11 10:47, Charles Walker wrote:
>>> What else does a proposal do when it takes effect?
>>>
>>
>> Turn into a monkey? It does whatever the rules say which, pre
[This time from my subscribed e-mail.]
On 6/3/11 11:10 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 06/03/11 10:47, Charles Walker wrote:
>> What else does a proposal do when it takes effect?
>>
>
> Turn into a monkey? It does whatever the rules say which, presently, is
> nothing.
In the absence of a rule defining
On 06/03/11 10:47, Charles Walker wrote:
What else does a proposal do when it takes effect?
Turn into a monkey? It does whatever the rules say which, presently, is
nothing.
Sean
On 3 June 2011 18:44, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 06/03/11 10:30, Charles Walker wrote:
>>
>> Gratuitous:
>>
>> We still have this in R106 (power 3):
>>
>> If the option selected by Agora on this decision is ADOPTED,
>> then the proposal is adopted, and unless other rules prevent it
>>
On 06/03/11 10:30, Charles Walker wrote:
Gratuitous:
We still have this in R106 (power 3):
If the option selected by Agora on this decision is ADOPTED,
then the proposal is adopted, and unless other rules prevent it
from taking effect, its power is set to the minimum of fou
On 3 June 2011 07:44, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I CFJ {When enacted, a proposal performs the changes stipulated in its
> text}.
>
> Rule 106 says
> A proposal is a fixed body of text which has been made into a
> proposal using a process specifically described in the Rules.
> When a person
On 11-06-03 12:57 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Sean Hunt wrote:
Note that the answer to this CFJ may well be TRUE by way of AIAN. By
preventing proposals from making rule changes, we would be left without a way
to ratify rule changes, I believe, and thus AIAN may have kicked in
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Sean Hunt wrote:
> By the English interpretation, poorly qualified is still qualified I think.
Gratuitous: In several previous cases, adding a qualifier to a
term has been found to create a wholly independent term (i.e.
not a subsetted term) if both are explicitly define
20 matches
Mail list logo
