On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Tanner Swett wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > I intend to deputize to Rotate the Bench. > > > > Hmm. > > > > Proto-CFJ for discussion (not CFJ for obvious reasons - need a justiciar!): > > > > It is possible to deputize to Rotate The Bench. > > CFJ 1776 states (using dated terminology) that it is possible to > deputise for the purpose of rotating the bench as long as there is > indeed a practical requirement to rotate the bench.
That's a very nice precedent, not dated at all when phrased as "if an officer can be punished as the net result of not doing something, doing it is a requirement." thx. -G.
