On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Thinking of defaults, I was also wondering about default
> expirations, (as these promises tend to lose relevance over time).
I think Horton's destruction without objection is sufficient for those.
On Thu, 23 May 2013, omd wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > If a player can take back (by cashing) a promise e posts on the tree, it
> > removes the whole purpose of the tree (if a pledge can be taken back, it's
> > not a pledge).
> >
> > How about "in eir possessi
On Tue, 21 May 2013, omd wrote:
> Proposal: relative dimension in sanity (AI=3)
>
> Amend Rule 2338 (Cashing Promises) by removing:
>
> If a promise is possessed by the Tree, any player except the
> promise's author CAN transfer it to emself by announcement, if e
> cashes the
3 matches
Mail list logo
