On Tue, 21 May 2013, omd wrote: > Proposal: relative dimension in sanity (AI=3) > > Amend Rule 2338 (Cashing Promises) by removing: > > If a promise is possessed by the Tree, any player except the > promise's author CAN transfer it to emself by announcement, if e > cashes the promise in the same message in which e transfers it > to emself. > > and by replacing "in eir possession" with "in eir or the Tree's possession"
If a player can take back (by cashing) a promise e posts on the tree, it removes the whole purpose of the tree (if a pledge can be taken back, it's not a pledge). How about "in eir possession, or in the Tree's possession if e is not the author". -G.
