Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Water Rights Enforcement

Pavitra wrote: > On Tuesday 04 November 2008 04:02:50 pm Alex Smith wrote: >> Does this mean that all the Ranches in existence are owned by the >> L&FD, and that none have ever been destroyed due to water rights >> enforcement? > > MASSIVE GAMESTATE RECALCULATION I believe you are correct, but o

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Water Rights Enforcement

On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I initiate an equity case for the AAA, whose members are listed below. > The state of affairs is the buggy automated WRV enforcement e-mail > should not have been sent. I recommend a judgement that causes the > effects of that

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Water Rights Enforcement

On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 16:46 -0600, Pavitra wrote: > On Tuesday 04 November 2008 04:02:50 pm Alex Smith wrote: > > Does this mean that all the Ranches in existence are owned by the > > L&FD, and that none have ever been destroyed due to water rights > > enforcement? > > MASSIVE GAMESTATE RECALCULAT

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Water Rights Enforcement

On Tuesday 04 November 2008 04:02:50 pm Alex Smith wrote: > Does this mean that all the Ranches in existence are owned by the > L&FD, and that none have ever been destroyed due to water rights > enforcement? MASSIVE GAMESTATE RECALCULATION

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Water Rights Enforcement

On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 17:00 -0500, comex wrote: > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Disregard the automated mail enforcing water rights, it is in error. > > > > If needed: For each WRV and land destroyed in my previous message > > about enforcing water right

DIS: Re: BUS: Water Rights Enforcement

On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Disregard the automated mail enforcing water rights, it is in error. > > If needed: For each WRV and land destroyed in my previous message > about enforcing water rights I create a corresponding WRV or land in > the correspond

DIS: Re: BUS: Water Rights Enforcement (automated)

On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 13:03 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I destroy 15 WRV in ais523's possession. > I destroy 21 WRV in woggle's possession. Can you fix this? No way did woggle have 21 Ranches, or even 21 Lands. -- ais523

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Water Rights Enforcement

On 01/04/2008, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, it makes sense, although I think maybe the result of not having > enough WRVs should be the destruction of random digit ranches rather > than random lands? If a Mill doesn't require water, not having enough > water shouldn't cause

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Water Rights Enforcement

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 4:21 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 01/04/2008, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I destroy 1 WRV in root's possession > > > > Oh, yay! I had somehow missed the fact that

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Water Rights Enforcement

On 01/04/2008, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I destroy 1 WRV in root's possession > > Oh, yay! I had somehow missed the fact that only digit ranches require water. Darn. I missed the fact that only digit ranche

DIS: Re: BUS: Water Rights Enforcement

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I destroy 1 WRV in root's possession Oh, yay! I had somehow missed the fact that only digit ranches require water. -root

DIS: Re: BUS: Water Rights Enforcement

This is why you need g-mail custom time . (http://mail.google.com/mail/help/customtime/index.html) On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Apologies to Iammars and OscarMeyr for doing this after subsidizati