On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Pavitra wrote:
>> I would argue that a player that 101-leaves and later comes back...
>>
ps. For some historical context, please see the very-underappreciated
CFJ 1272; the caller's arguments and the first paragraphs of the judge's
a
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Pavitra wrote:
> I would argue that a player that 101-leaves and later comes back
> retroactively accepts eir back liabilities, as e has changed eir
> decision to wholly ignore the game. This seems fair; it doesn't break
> the right, it doesn't allow exploitation of the mechan
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Pavitra wrote:
>> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> And at what moment of time do we apply that and do the recordkeepors
>>> decide e is a non-player? (Making em inactive etc. is different, that's
>>> us making em a non player whether or not e consents).
>>
>> In the
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Pavitra wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> And at what moment of time do we apply that and do the recordkeepors
>> decide e is a non-player? (Making em inactive etc. is different, that's
>> us making em a non player whether or not e consents).
>
> In theory, it takes effect at th
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Pavitra wrote:
>> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> with:
>>>vii. Every player has the right to deregister and thereby cease
>>> to be a player by informing all other players.
>>
>> I don't want an attempt to use R101(vii) to retroactively turn out
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Pavitra wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> with:
>>vii. Every player has the right to deregister and thereby cease
>> to be a player by informing all other players.
>
> I don't want an attempt to use R101(vii) to retroactively turn out to
> have platonically fa
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> with:
>vii. Every player has the right to deregister and thereby cease
> to be a player by informing all other players.
I don't want an attempt to use R101(vii) to retroactively turn out to
have platonically failed because the person somehow accidentally o
2009/9/18 Kerim Aydin :
> For my current status there's a perfectly good word to use:
> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/kibitzer
I guess I'm the peanut gallery kibitzer.
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, ais523 wrote:
> Anyway, what I was referring to is not "G. is playing", but "it seems to
> be consensus that exercising your right to stop playing has to be done
> deliberately, and with an actual intent to stop playing more or less
> permanently". I'm not sure if that opinion
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 08:11 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, ais523 wrote:
> > There's no evidence that G. intends to stop playing Agora altogether
> > forever; quite the opposite, I would say.
>
> I have no support for the incorrect and wholly specious current
> assumption that a
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, ais523 wrote:
> There's no evidence that G. intends to stop playing Agora altogether
> forever; quite the opposite, I would say.
I have no support for the incorrect and wholly specious current
assumption that a deregistered player/watcher is actually "playing".
By most common
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 20:52 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > I intend, without Objection, to register.
>
> I CFJ on the statement { If G.'s possible registration in the above
> message were successful, then G. would now be a party to the Fantasy
> Rules Contest. }, disqualifying ais5
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> If I am a player, I deregister. (was not planning on playing until after
> my vacation next week at the earliest, and ais523's mousetrap is making
> me nervous).
Come back soon! I'm no good as an anti-scamster.
--
-c.
13 matches
Mail list logo
