On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Pavitra wrote: >> I would argue that a player that 101-leaves and later comes back... >>
ps. For some historical context, please see the very-underappreciated CFJ 1272; the caller's arguments and the first paragraphs of the judge's arguments are directly relevant, and as a whole that judgement set the context for the (much later) rights-form of R101. -G.
