Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Three obvious CFJs

2012-08-29 Thread Tanner Swett
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Encasing one of your ISIDs in an ISIDefine does not prevent it from being > ISID. Also, CFJ 2737. I'm not attempting to do anything that even *resembles* infinite descent. Why do you think I am? CFJ 2737 is irrelevant here, because I am not

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Three obvious CFJs

2012-08-29 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012, Tanner Swett wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Sean Hunt > wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Tanner Swett wrote: > >> Define the word "‮ooF‬" as meaning {I call a CFJ on the statement "I > >> have already called a CFJ in this message. (Foo)".}, and defin

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Three obvious CFJs

2012-08-29 Thread Tanner Swett
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Tanner Swett wrote: >> Define the word "‮ooF‬" as meaning {I call a CFJ on the statement "I >> have already called a CFJ in this message. (Foo)".}, and define the >> word "‮raB‬" as meaning {I call a CFJ on the s

DIS: Re: BUS: Three obvious CFJs

2012-08-29 Thread Sean Hunt
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Tanner Swett wrote: > Define the word "‮ooF‬" as meaning {I call a CFJ on the statement "I > have already called a CFJ in this message. (Foo)".}, and define the > word "‮raB‬" as meaning {I call a CFJ on the statement "I have already > called a CFJ in this message.