On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 14:13, ais523 wrote:
> I play Penalty Box to audit Murphy.
>
If this was successful it created 10 rests in Murphy's possession
(Murphy had 55 cards, 48 over hand limit).
BobTHJ
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:46, ais523 wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 10:44 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 14:13, ais523 wrote:
>> > I play Penalty Box to audit Murphy.
>> >
>> Fails as far as I can tell. With Notice is defined in the rules and
>> requires a minimum of 4 days
On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 10:44 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 14:13, ais523 wrote:
> > I play Penalty Box to audit Murphy.
> >
> Fails as far as I can tell. With Notice is defined in the rules and
> requires a minimum of 4 days.
>
I gave arguments about this afterwards. With Not
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 14:13, ais523 wrote:
> I play Penalty Box to audit Murphy.
>
Fails as far as I can tell. With Notice is defined in the rules and
requires a minimum of 4 days.
BobTHJ
On Sat, 2009-09-19 at 21:22 +0100, ais523 wrote:
> Rule 1728 does not define With Notice at all; instead, it treats the
> words as a trigger that allow an action to be done in a dependent
> manner. In fact, I can't see any rules or contracts that purport to
> allow a person to perform an action /de
5 matches
Mail list logo
