Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Testing SHOULD

2009-02-17 Thread Alex Smith
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 11:11 -0600, Benjamin Caplan wrote: > Alex Smith wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 12:02 -0500, Sgeo wrote: > >> I Contest this NoV on the basis that it is unclear whether it is > >> possible to violate a SHOULD. > > > > I initiate a criminal case into the circumstances surrou

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Testing SHOULD

2009-02-17 Thread Benjamin Caplan
Alex Smith wrote: > On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 12:02 -0500, Sgeo wrote: >> I Contest this NoV on the basis that it is unclear whether it is >> possible to violate a SHOULD. > > I initiate a criminal case into the circumstances surrounding this NoV, > to try to find out whether it is possible to violate

DIS: Re: BUS: Testing SHOULD

2009-02-17 Thread Alex Smith
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 12:02 -0500, Sgeo wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Alexander Smith wrote: > > I NoV against Sgeo for violating rule 1750 by failing to read the > > ruleset during Read the Ruleset week, and also failing to > > understand or to carefully weigh the consequences of this