On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 12:02 -0500, Sgeo wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Alexander Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk> wrote:
> > I NoV against Sgeo for violating rule 1750 by failing to read the
> > ruleset during Read the Ruleset week, and also failing to
> > understand or to carefully weigh the consequences of this failure.
> >
> > Arguments: MMI describes SHOULD this way:
> > {{{
> > Before failing to perform
> > the described action, the full implications of failing to
> > perform it should be understood and carefully weighed.
> > }}}
> > Sgeo has admitted (in our IRC discussion forum) that e did not
> > understand and carefully weigh the consequences of failing to read
> > the rules during RTR week before RTR week ended.
> >
>
> I Contest this NoV on the basis that it is unclear whether it is
> possible to violate a SHOULD.
I initiate a criminal case into the circumstances surrounding this NoV,
to try to find out whether it is possible to violate a SHOULD.
--
ais523
