Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Taking the plunge

2009-01-15 Thread Ed Murphy
Wooble wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/notes.php (now includes rank) > > I think this is showing every case as disinterested at the moment, > unless I'm reading it wrong. Of course, I'm still doing all the > conducting manually at

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Taking the plunge

2009-01-15 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: > http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/notes.php (now includes rank) I think this is showing every case as disinterested at the moment, unless I'm reading it wrong. Of course, I'm still doing all the conducting manually at the moment anyway.

DIS: Re: BUS: Taking the plunge

2009-01-14 Thread Ed Murphy
ais523 wrote: > On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 15:13 +, Alex Smith wrote: >> I flip my judicial rank to 3. >> >> Without 2 objections, I intend to flip the II of each of the following >> CFJs to 2: >> >> CFJ 2316 (about whether pre-emptive objections work; that one has since >> been fixed by proposal,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Taking the plunge

2009-01-08 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Alex Smith wrote: > On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 07:53 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> I flip my judicial rank to 3. I object to each of the below intents >> (for at least as long as it might take others to respond). -Goethe > Many of them are on already-assigned cases, but that's prob

DIS: Re: BUS: Taking the plunge

2009-01-08 Thread Alex Smith
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 07:53 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > I flip my judicial rank to 3. I object to each of the below intents > (for at least as long as it might take others to respond). -Goethe Many of them are on already-assigned cases, but that's probably a wise idea anyway. Hmm... Agora shou