ais523 wrote: > On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 15:13 +0000, Alex Smith wrote: >> I flip my judicial rank to 3. >> >> Without 2 objections, I intend to flip the II of each of the following >> CFJs to 2: >> >> CFJ 2316 (about whether pre-emptive objections work; that one has since >> been fixed by proposal, but it's relevant to know whether it mattered >> earlier) >> >> CFJ 2322 (about whether private contracts allow act-on-behalf) >> >> CFJs 2321 and 2282 (which were both appealed; 2282 about the annotation >> scam, 2321 about Goethe's recent without-objections scam) >> >> Without 2 objections, I intend to flip the II of CFJ 2331 to 0 (rule >> 104, again...) >> >> I encourage players to remember to set the II of CFJs in the future. > > With only 1 objection (from Goethe), I set IIs of CFJs as I intended in > the above message. (We have several rank-3 judges now, so it should be a > safe way to allocate important CFJs as opposed to a scam to take over > the judicial system.)
H. Conductor Wooble, I've fixed up the following if you want to use them in any sort of automation: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/notes.php (now includes rank) http://zenith.homelinux.net/assessor/notes.php
